> Nope. on the one hand, Jesus was addressing the physical reality of how
> nervous systems process-information. {and, on the other hand,
> Infinitely-more.]
>> i just worked to understand nervous system function ~2000 years later, and
> the correlations to what Jesus Taught are so Obvious, i couldn't miss 'em.
>
funny how everyone else did then.
> i must be doing something right if, "'people must be good'". i've never said
> that, you found it in-there on your own. you've been delving beneath the
> 'language'-interface stuff :-)
you may not have said it verbatim but your saccharine tones in just
about every post suggest as much. you really are extremely
patronising and then wonder why people don't reply or do so with
distain (are you reading beneath this now - i.e. its BS)
>> "'companies must benefit society'" - i didn't say such. i've just discussed
> the Consequences inherent. understanding the Consequences, inherent,
> folks're Free to Choose their own ways, but the Consequences are there, or
> not, depending on the Choice inherent.
do you, like, pick up a dictionary find a word you think sounds good
and then use it all the time?
>> "'we must honour truth'" - never said this, either, but what's inherent is
> as above.
I think you actually may have said that more than a few times
> at an extraordinarily-high WDB2T-Cost.
>
this thermodynamic malarky you are so keen to profess demonstrates a
real lack of understanding of physics. You suggest that people have a
'choice' as to whether to follow the second law of thermodynamics -
don't you see how stupid that is? Thermodynamics are the laws of
nature, no one or thing has a choice whether to follow them.
Everything we do follows them as they are how the physical universe
'works' (apart from some instances where the second law does not hold
apparently - http://www.nature.com/nsu/020722/020722-2.html)
