T9W,
Mr. August was one of the first to *condemn* affirmative action, and it was
almost exclusively because of the willingness of people like him to speak
out against it on forums just like this, and NOT because of any great effort
by our lackluster "politicians" and "bureaucrats", that aa was proven to be
illegal, unconstitutional, and amoral. This led to the passage of
Proposition 209 in a landslide victory, which literally changed that
national attitude.
You'd be amazed at how fast things change once the TRUTH is documented, T9W.
John Knight
"The 9th Witch" <appalachian_witch at hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:ahmbom$u9k8o$1 at ID-131540.news.dfncis.de...
> Dear Mr. August,
>>> How many ways to you need to be told that we don't give a flying .uck?
>> HAND.ON
>> T9W
>> PS. On a side note: If you don't like the system, work to change it. You
> sound like a po' person bitchin' about the rich.
>>> Richard C. August <raugust at ptd.net> wrote in message
> news:Liw%8.426$Fl.40827 at nnrp1.ptd.net...> > Dear ShadowDancer,
> >
> > Here's why I don't NEED to spend wasted hours and wasted money before a
> > psychotherapist concerning my feelings, and the fact that I no longer
want
> a
> > relationship with a woman.
> >
> > http://www.4woman.gov/faq/violence.pdf contains a summary of all the
> Federal
> > laws, regulations, and directives concerning what the US Federal
> Government
> > considers and teaches is violence against women. Basically, it says
that
> if
> > I say or do something to a woman, and it makes her feel insecure,
> violated,
> > or frightened, she has the right to sue me or have me imprisoned.
> >
> > If I say something to a woman, and she feels violated, I'm at fault
> whether
> > I meant it in love or not.
> > If I say NOTHING to a woman, and she feels violated, I'm at fault no
> matter
> > what I meant by that.
> > If I do something to a woman, and she is frightened, I'm at fault no
> matter
> > how I meant to do that act.
> > If I do NOTHING to a woman, and she is frightened, I'm at fault no
matter
> > how I meant to do NOTHING to her.
> > If I tell a woman I love her, and she feels insecure about that, she can
> sue
> > me for sexual threats or harrassment, no matter how I meant to tell her
I
> > love her.
> > If I don't tell a woman I love her, and she feels as if I don't love her
> at
> > all, she can still sue me for abuse because I gave no expression of
love.
> > If I date a woman, according to feminist tripe, I am exercising license
to
> > rape her.
> > If I don't date a woman, women think I hate them.
> > Never mind that the individual woman by her looks, actions, and words,
> might
> > have driven her friend or partner to commit "violence" against her to
> > protect her from herself or outside forces. She is "never" the cause of
> the
> > violence, according to the cited .pdf file. Never mind that she could
> have
> > STARTED a vase-throwing fisticuff knock down drag out fight. She is
> "never"
> > the cause of the domestic violence or partner abuse. She is "always"
the
> > victim. Here it is, Federally defined. Read it and weep.
> >
> > Does it take 3.5 million more or less brain cells per individual to
> > determine that with all of these anti-violence laws enforced, men end up
> > being ambivalent toward women and women end up dateless?
> >
> > Does it take 3.5 million more or less brain cells to figure out that
> because
> > of all these violence against women laws, that men are so confused and
> upset
> > about what defines violence that they don't want to be bothered dating
> > women?
> >
> > Does it take 3.5 million more or less brain cells to really figure that
> real
> > men don't want to abuse women but nurture and care for them instead, but
> are
> > confused about how to do it because very often the nurturing and caring
> for
> > them constitutes ABUSE as defined in Federal law?
> >
> > Does it take 3.5 million more or less brain cells to get a clue that
> > American heterosexual men are tired of listening to feminist rants and
> raves
> > and whines?
> >
> > Let's see what "100 years of progress between genders" has done:
> >
> > 96% of American prison population is male. US prisons account for 2/3
of
> > the total world's incarcerated population, with US courts having the
most
> > attorneys in physical number and per capita percentage worldwide.
> >
> > US Women were the heiresses of 70% of the world's total wealth in the
> 1960s
> > when most families were male headed and the man was the sole
breadwinner.
> > Now, US Women are among the poorest in developed nations, with a net
debt
> of
> > $40,000 per person. That's -$40,000 to those who don't know what debt
is.
> >
> > Although violent acts against women overall decreased from 1993-1998,
the
> > rate of domestic partnership with women involved also decreased at least
> > fivefold. The rate of divorces increased slightly, and the rate of
> multiple
> > marriages and divorces also increased. The crime rate for daylight
crimes
> > between both genders INCREASED, while nighttime crimes between domestic
> > partners leveled off or increased only negligibly. Women lost their
> > protection when they lost their partners. Big Brother Government
stepped
> > in, and committed a worse act of violence by stripping women from their
> > FAMILIES.
> >
> > Punishment also doesn't fit the crime committed. For every crime
> committed,
> > when the crime was exactly the same in type and nature, men received at
> > least double the sentence than women, with at least three times the
> > incarceration rate, time, and duration. Karla Faye Tucker was only a
> token
> > death sentence by then Texas Governor Dubya, for many women can claim
> "self
> > defence" when they murder someone, and thus get away with it.
> >
> > US Men and Women are now subjected to an educational system with bloated
> > budgets, inflationary tactics, and run down schools. What used to be
the
> > envy of the world now only produces bimbos who can't score above the
rest
> of
> > the world in TIMSS, ACT, or SAT scores. US Women are at the BOTTOM of
> that
> > list and would have scored better had they just "guessed" at the
answers.
> >
> > US Women are no longer prized for their intellect and beauty. US Women
> are
> > considered trash by the rest of the world, and rightly so.
> >
> > US Men and Women are now eating 150 lbs of sugar per year per person,
and
> > are growing more obese and diabetic with less nutrition and more
disease,
> as
> > opposed to 100 years ago, when only 5 lbs of sugar per person per year
was
> > consumed.
> >
> > US Men and Women are now medicated with Lithium, Respiridol, and
Ritalin,
> > and Valium/Valerian Root at a much higher rate than before. Ostensibly
> this
> > is to calm violence and mood swings. Actually, this causes more health
> and
> > mental problems than it solves, including coordination, athletic,
> > concentration, and creativity challenges.
> >
> > Does it take 3.5 million more brain cells to figure why men like me
don't
> > want to date or have a non-mandatory relationship with a woman any more?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Sincerely,
> >
> >
> > Richard C. August
> >
> > "Shadow Dancer" <insomniac at winterslight.org> wrote in message
> > news:ahle5u$tapi4$1 at ID-150265.news.dfncis.de...> > > "Richard C. August" <raugust at ptd.net> wrote in message
> > > news:p2b%8.95$Fl.17779 at nnrp1.ptd.net...> > > > Dear Parse Tree,
> > > >
> > > > US GDP has absolutely NOTHING, NADA, ZIP, ZERO to do with the FACT
> that
> > we
> > > > have 400 times as many lawyers as the Japanese. In the trade wars
vs.
> t
> > he
> > > > Japanese, guess who's winning and has been winning since the late
> 1970s?
> > > > Let me give you a CLUE -- lawsuit happy people feed lawyers HUGE
sums
> of
> > > > money for PETTY little trivialities like being burned by a hot cup
of
> > > coffee
> > > > coming out of a Mickey D's, and winning $8,000,000 as a result.
Does
> > THAT
> > > > happen in Japan?? No.........
> > > >
> > > > I also am not under the delusion that I have a right to a
relationship
> > > with
> > > > a woman. The only relationship to a woman that I have a right to
have
> > is
> > > > the OBLIGATORY relationship I have to my MOTHER. Otherwise, I DO
NOT
> > WANT
> > > A
> > > > RELATIONSHIP WITH A WOMAN. I don't want one! I don't care whether
I
> > have
> > > > that right or not! I DO NOT WANT A GIRLFRIEND OR A WIFE OR A
PARAMOUR
> > > > BECAUSE I DO NOT WANT A WOMAN!!! I don't care to even have a right
to
> a
> > > > relationship with a woman because I don't want a relationship with a
> > woman
> > > > in the first place.
> > > >
> > > > Here's why I don't want a relationship with a woman. VAWA 1
declares
> > that
> > > > if she and I have a dispute, and I turn around and walk away and say
> > > nothing
> > > > to her at all, and I don't even touch her at all, because I have
said
> > > > nothing to her at all, I have given her the "silent treatment" and
> > > therefore
> > > > committed an act of violence against her. I didn't hit her or touch
> > her.
> > > I
> > > > didn't even call her a name. I said nothing to her, and still,
that's
> > an
> > > > act of violence. I would still commit an act of violence against
her
> if
> > I
> > > > DID touch her, but she felt the touch was inappropriate. I may have
> > > > caressed her head lovingly. I may have stroked her cheek. I may
have
> > > > hugged her. If she doesn't like it, it's SEXUAL HARRASSMENT, an act
> of
> > > > violence against her. For a hug, or for saying nothing to her and
> doing
> > > > nothing to her at all, I go to jail either way.
> > > >
> > > > If a woman I might love is misusing money, and I assist her with a
> > budget
> > > > plan to help her save money or a savings account to help her keep
more
> > of
> > > > the money she earns, and she doesn't like the way I do it despite
good
> > > > results, that's controlling her finances, and that's also an ACT OF
> > > VIOLENCE
> > > > against her.
> > > >
> > > > And for every woman I meet, whether I like her or not, she is still
in
> > > some
> > > > kind of a committed relationship with another man. Given these
social
> > and
> > > > legal conditions, is she worth fighting over with another man? Let
> him
> > > keep
> > > > her. I'll take the Monastery, thank you. My relationship with God
in
> > > Jesus
> > > > Christ is VASTLY more important to me than a sexual relationship
with
> > some
> > > > woman.
> > > >
> > > > Meanwhile, I pray that what happened to me by my ex-wife during my
> > former
> > > > marriage would happen to you so you would learn well the lesson John
> > > Knight
> > > > and I have gently tried to teach you. Because of Battered Women's
> > > Shelters
> > > > and VAWA, growing numbers of heterosexual men now want NOTHING more
to
> > do
> > > > with women at all. They'd rather vomit than make love. I guess
> > celibacy
> > > > isn't such a bad thing after all, is it? It keeps me and thousands
of
> > > other
> > > > sadder but wiser men out of jail for merely making love.
> > > >
> > > > Sincerely,
> > > >
> > > > Richard C. August
> > > > Free, MALE, Celibate and loving it!!
> > >
> > > Wahh wahh wahh wahh....you don't see me complaining about the bad
> > > experiences I've had with certain men.
> > >
> > > Why don't you do us all a favor and spend some time and money on
> > > psychotherapy to resolve your obvious problems?
> > >
> > > This has nothing whatsoever to do with the original subject. If you
> > insist
> > > on whining about your problems, try some of the self-help psychology
> > groups.
> > >
> > > The Shadow Dancer
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>>
