mat wrote in message <43525ce3.0207240229.65f86402 at posting.google.com>...
>"Kenneth Collins" <k.p.collins at worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
news:<dFc%8.82$pg2.7153 at bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>...
>> mat wrote in message <43525ce3.0207230242.638247e1 at posting.google.com>...
>> >> you know, Peter, taken by itself, NDT's reification of the phenomenon
of
>> >> "decussation" is the most-significant result that's ever been produced
in
>> >> all of Science.
>> >
>> >do you actually know what decussation is?
>>>> i wrote the book on it.
>>so self-assured again. not 'a' book but 'the' book
i stand on what i posted, but, as i said in another post, admit that i'm
'embarassed' by what i've accomplished. it's not my 'style' to 'make a big
deal' out of stuff, with respect to myself. having to do so is 'Hard'.
>>> when i sent AoK out, it usually came back into my hands within three
days.
>> that means someone in the mailroom was the only one 'deciding' on it. i
>> doubt it was ever read.
>>did you enclose a letter claiming it was the greatest achievement in
>all of science? you might want to tone it down a little as people
>usually take afront to someone claiming so much having shown so
>little.
i usually included a cover letter, lacking 'style', lacking any
'institutional address', lacking any standard 'credentials', and, therefore,
'begging' that this or that ms., enclosed, nevertheless, be considered.
you know, a pretty-much 'standard-reaction' to foreknowledge with respect to
'the way things are supposed to be', and how far 'outside' of such i could
only 'stand'.
don't 'bust' me too much until you find yourself in analogous circumstances.
[then, if you succeed, i'd appreciate it if you shared your method with me.
Teach me how to cross such 'barriers'.
>>> >Please enlighten as to how you know this? Given his supposed
>> >omnipotence I would have thought that knowing how the brain works
>> >would not be hard, especially as he is also supposed to have been
>> >amongst those who designed it.
>>>> well, for instance, last night, as almost always, i read the following
days
>> _Old and _New Testament_ Scriptural readings. only, since my near vision
is
>> 'going down the tubes', i 'saw' "Mat" 7: 14-15, 18-20, instead of the
actual
>> "Mi" 7: 14-15, 18-20.
>>>> Mat.7: 14-15:"Enter through the narrow gate: for the gate is wide and the
>> road broad that leads to destruction, and those who enter through it are
>> many. How narrow the gate, and constricted the road that leads to life.
And
>> those who find it are few."
>>>> there, in a 'nutshell', exists a =Perfect= metaphorical statement of
what's
>> important with respect to TD E/I-minimization.
>>metaphorical hmmm. you might also consider that it has nothing to do
>with your ideas and that is your very abstracted interpretation that
>leads you to conclude that he is talking about TD E/I or whatever.
>but no, of course he's directy addressing you and your ideas.
no. as i've explained, after working through the Science, i Saw that Jesus
had already stated the stuff that the Science points to, with respect to
Human behavior.
everybody 'thinks' i'm 'evangelizing'.
all i'm doing is not being a Plagerist. [if you care to know, i wept when i
saw i had to do it. i understood the 'costs' inherent. i wanted to be a
'Great Scientist', but i'll die alone, impoverished, and unremembered. "oh
well."]
but since i've got to not-be-a-Plagerist, i've also declared my Belief.
this, in order =not= to Dceive folks with respect to such. to Guard folks'
Free Wills.
>>>>> it's just not practical to write a Neuroanatomy text in little snippets
in
>> an online discussion 'place'.
>>didn't think so, it always seems that to actually explain you couldn't
>write it here, instead we get a load of rubbish on 'people must be
>good' 'companies must benefit society' 'we must honour truth' and
>other such happy-clappy flower-power ideas that you actually think you
>originated.
to do what you say, i'd have to copy, at length, from texts. i didn't do any
of the work that's in such texts. so i don't want to give the appearance
that i'm 'taking credit' for having done any of it.
that means what's left for me to discuss is what i =have= done - as is
explained in AoK's Preface, stuff that's reified, for the first 'time' in my
own work, through my own efforts, in my own mind, put-on-paper, for the
first 'time', by my hands, communicated to others, for the first 'time', by
me.
everyone 'thinks' i'm some kind of 'jackass', when anyone who actually
Thinks can see that all i'm doing is being Scrupulous with respect to
Honoring the work that others have done.
it's one of those things that it is 'embarassing' for me to discuss. the
work i've done not only builds upon the work done by others, but
=integrates= it.
i'm "stuck between a rock and a hard place". i'm 'embarassed' for the folks
who did the work that my work builds-upon, but who, for whatever reason,
failed to do the integration. if i talk about such, everyone 'moves away
from' me, i expect, because they, too, are 'embarassed' about their failure
to do the integration.
i've tried, thousands of 'times', to 'enlist' folks' interest. no one's ever
interacted with me in that way, so how can i, then, feel free to publicly
copy their work, just to provide what anyone who wants it can get by paying
the Authors for their work through the purchasing of the Authors' texts, or
Journal photo-copy fees?
it might seem 'trivial' to folks, but it's not to me. i've long experience
with the fruits of my labors being 'borrowed', without any acknowledgement.
there's been a rather-concerted effort to dinigrate my Being so that an
illusion of this or that is generated in other folks eyes, that "i could
not've possibly done the work which i have, in fact, Verifiably, done".
all such stuff 'Hurts", =Big-'Time'.
my way of 'dealing' with such is to See how much 'Hurts', and make sure i
don't do anything like it to others.
which, if you look, you'll find is =WHY= i Acknowledge Jesus' Priority.
i =Will-NOT= 'Hurt' anybody the way folks've 'Hurt' me.
such extends to Jesus, for Goodness' sakes. The Man was Crucified for just
Loving folks.
in my small way, i Understand some of what's inherent.
i Honor Truth with respect to such.
anyway, "you've got the cart before the horse", in the general 'surmise'
that you're presenting.
where you assert 'impropriety', all there is is Scrupulousness, and my own
longing not to do to others what's been done to me.
and, if you 'wonder', i'm =still= 'embarassed' at having to broach the
topic.
i've Begged folks to allow me to explain all this to them, in-person, and
=not= for publication, because it's long been clear to me that because i've
Chosen-Honor, folks're 'reading' into my correlated 'Silence' all manner of
False-Imaginings with respect to my Being.
'Hurts' like Hell.
everyone 'just' goes ahead and 'Imagines'?
"never mind" that i've been =BEGGING= folks, all along to meet with me,
in-person, to answer =any= and =all= 'questions' they wish to ask, Promising
to provide all necessary means for them to achieve Verification Independent
of me... all, on the single Condition that they 'Hurt' no one other than me.
go ahead and check.
i have done this one act of Begging thousands of 'times'.
yet, everything that's Dispicable is heaped upon me, the only one who's been
trying not to 'Hurt' anyone.
go figure.
anyway, forgive me for saying so, but your general 'surmise', which is
sufficiently-obvious, is not founded in Reality.
>>>>> one follows the one 'map' of WDB2T over the course of =long= experience.
>>is this some reference to the second law of thermodynamics?
>>>> when one strays from WDB2T, TD E/I(up) happens, and vice versa.
>>how can anything stray from the laws of thermodynamics?
that's just it :-)
but, folks try.
anyone can 'move' in any direction with respect to WDB2T's one 'map'. and
some of such is most-often flat-out necessary because, otherwise, folks'd
just wander into some local-minimum, and get trapped within it.
but 'moving away from' 'climbing' the energy gradient that is WDB2T requires
the expenditure of 'extra' energy, which 'just' goes to Waste. our nervous
systems 'recognize' such in the form of occurrences of TD E/I(up).
and where things really get mucked-up is when folks 'endeavor' to
'manipulate' Truth [as, for instance, has been the case with 'stock
options', and other forms of 'funny'-numbers 'accounting]. such tends to
diverge, uncontrollably, with respect to WDB2T, =always= precipitating
catastrophe [in the Maths sense; Rene Thom]. and, when such happens, there's
'Misery' all over the place.
its the foreknowledge with respect to the information-processing dynamics,
inherent, that underpins the 'lecturing' stuff i post, and which some
'perceive' as indicating that i'm 'puffed-up', etc.
but all i'm doing is Loving folks.
working to draw them back from the brink of the catastrophe[s] that they
cannot [yet] See themselves.
working to give them the ability to See-for-themselves.
the 'Crimes' for which i will die alone, impoverished, and unremembered.
k. p. collins
