Dear Mr. August,
How many ways to you need to be told that we don't give a flying fuck?
HAND.ON
T9W
PS. On a side note: If you don't like the system, work to change it. You
sound like a po' person bitchin' about the rich.
Richard C. August <raugust at ptd.net> wrote in message
news:Liw%8.426$Fl.40827 at nnrp1.ptd.net...
> Dear ShadowDancer,
>> Here's why I don't NEED to spend wasted hours and wasted money before a
> psychotherapist concerning my feelings, and the fact that I no longer want
a
> relationship with a woman.
>>http://www.4woman.gov/faq/violence.pdf contains a summary of all the
Federal
> laws, regulations, and directives concerning what the US Federal
Government
> considers and teaches is violence against women. Basically, it says that
if
> I say or do something to a woman, and it makes her feel insecure,
violated,
> or frightened, she has the right to sue me or have me imprisoned.
>> If I say something to a woman, and she feels violated, I'm at fault
whether
> I meant it in love or not.
> If I say NOTHING to a woman, and she feels violated, I'm at fault no
matter
> what I meant by that.
> If I do something to a woman, and she is frightened, I'm at fault no
matter
> how I meant to do that act.
> If I do NOTHING to a woman, and she is frightened, I'm at fault no matter
> how I meant to do NOTHING to her.
> If I tell a woman I love her, and she feels insecure about that, she can
sue
> me for sexual threats or harrassment, no matter how I meant to tell her I
> love her.
> If I don't tell a woman I love her, and she feels as if I don't love her
at
> all, she can still sue me for abuse because I gave no expression of love.
> If I date a woman, according to feminist tripe, I am exercising license to
> rape her.
> If I don't date a woman, women think I hate them.
> Never mind that the individual woman by her looks, actions, and words,
might
> have driven her friend or partner to commit "violence" against her to
> protect her from herself or outside forces. She is "never" the cause of
the
> violence, according to the cited .pdf file. Never mind that she could
have
> STARTED a vase-throwing fisticuff knock down drag out fight. She is
"never"
> the cause of the domestic violence or partner abuse. She is "always" the
> victim. Here it is, Federally defined. Read it and weep.
>> Does it take 3.5 million more or less brain cells per individual to
> determine that with all of these anti-violence laws enforced, men end up
> being ambivalent toward women and women end up dateless?
>> Does it take 3.5 million more or less brain cells to figure out that
because
> of all these violence against women laws, that men are so confused and
upset
> about what defines violence that they don't want to be bothered dating
> women?
>> Does it take 3.5 million more or less brain cells to really figure that
real
> men don't want to abuse women but nurture and care for them instead, but
are
> confused about how to do it because very often the nurturing and caring
for
> them constitutes ABUSE as defined in Federal law?
>> Does it take 3.5 million more or less brain cells to get a clue that
> American heterosexual men are tired of listening to feminist rants and
raves
> and whines?
>> Let's see what "100 years of progress between genders" has done:
>> 96% of American prison population is male. US prisons account for 2/3 of
> the total world's incarcerated population, with US courts having the most
> attorneys in physical number and per capita percentage worldwide.
>> US Women were the heiresses of 70% of the world's total wealth in the
1960s
> when most families were male headed and the man was the sole breadwinner.
> Now, US Women are among the poorest in developed nations, with a net debt
of
> $40,000 per person. That's -$40,000 to those who don't know what debt is.
>> Although violent acts against women overall decreased from 1993-1998, the
> rate of domestic partnership with women involved also decreased at least
> fivefold. The rate of divorces increased slightly, and the rate of
multiple
> marriages and divorces also increased. The crime rate for daylight crimes
> between both genders INCREASED, while nighttime crimes between domestic
> partners leveled off or increased only negligibly. Women lost their
> protection when they lost their partners. Big Brother Government stepped
> in, and committed a worse act of violence by stripping women from their
> FAMILIES.
>> Punishment also doesn't fit the crime committed. For every crime
committed,
> when the crime was exactly the same in type and nature, men received at
> least double the sentence than women, with at least three times the
> incarceration rate, time, and duration. Karla Faye Tucker was only a
token
> death sentence by then Texas Governor Dubya, for many women can claim
"self
> defence" when they murder someone, and thus get away with it.
>> US Men and Women are now subjected to an educational system with bloated
> budgets, inflationary tactics, and run down schools. What used to be the
> envy of the world now only produces bimbos who can't score above the rest
of
> the world in TIMSS, ACT, or SAT scores. US Women are at the BOTTOM of
that
> list and would have scored better had they just "guessed" at the answers.
>> US Women are no longer prized for their intellect and beauty. US Women
are
> considered trash by the rest of the world, and rightly so.
>> US Men and Women are now eating 150 lbs of sugar per year per person, and
> are growing more obese and diabetic with less nutrition and more disease,
as
> opposed to 100 years ago, when only 5 lbs of sugar per person per year was
> consumed.
>> US Men and Women are now medicated with Lithium, Respiridol, and Ritalin,
> and Valium/Valerian Root at a much higher rate than before. Ostensibly
this
> is to calm violence and mood swings. Actually, this causes more health
and
> mental problems than it solves, including coordination, athletic,
> concentration, and creativity challenges.
>> Does it take 3.5 million more brain cells to figure why men like me don't
> want to date or have a non-mandatory relationship with a woman any more?
>>>>> Sincerely,
>>> Richard C. August
>> "Shadow Dancer" <insomniac at winterslight.org> wrote in message
> news:ahle5u$tapi4$1 at ID-150265.news.dfncis.de...> > "Richard C. August" <raugust at ptd.net> wrote in message
> > news:p2b%8.95$Fl.17779 at nnrp1.ptd.net...> > > Dear Parse Tree,
> > >
> > > US GDP has absolutely NOTHING, NADA, ZIP, ZERO to do with the FACT
that
> we
> > > have 400 times as many lawyers as the Japanese. In the trade wars vs.
t
> he
> > > Japanese, guess who's winning and has been winning since the late
1970s?
> > > Let me give you a CLUE -- lawsuit happy people feed lawyers HUGE sums
of
> > > money for PETTY little trivialities like being burned by a hot cup of
> > coffee
> > > coming out of a Mickey D's, and winning $8,000,000 as a result. Does
> THAT
> > > happen in Japan?? No.........
> > >
> > > I also am not under the delusion that I have a right to a relationship
> > with
> > > a woman. The only relationship to a woman that I have a right to have
> is
> > > the OBLIGATORY relationship I have to my MOTHER. Otherwise, I DO NOT
> WANT
> > A
> > > RELATIONSHIP WITH A WOMAN. I don't want one! I don't care whether I
> have
> > > that right or not! I DO NOT WANT A GIRLFRIEND OR A WIFE OR A PARAMOUR
> > > BECAUSE I DO NOT WANT A WOMAN!!! I don't care to even have a right to
a
> > > relationship with a woman because I don't want a relationship with a
> woman
> > > in the first place.
> > >
> > > Here's why I don't want a relationship with a woman. VAWA 1 declares
> that
> > > if she and I have a dispute, and I turn around and walk away and say
> > nothing
> > > to her at all, and I don't even touch her at all, because I have said
> > > nothing to her at all, I have given her the "silent treatment" and
> > therefore
> > > committed an act of violence against her. I didn't hit her or touch
> her.
> > I
> > > didn't even call her a name. I said nothing to her, and still, that's
> an
> > > act of violence. I would still commit an act of violence against her
if
> I
> > > DID touch her, but she felt the touch was inappropriate. I may have
> > > caressed her head lovingly. I may have stroked her cheek. I may have
> > > hugged her. If she doesn't like it, it's SEXUAL HARRASSMENT, an act
of
> > > violence against her. For a hug, or for saying nothing to her and
doing
> > > nothing to her at all, I go to jail either way.
> > >
> > > If a woman I might love is misusing money, and I assist her with a
> budget
> > > plan to help her save money or a savings account to help her keep more
> of
> > > the money she earns, and she doesn't like the way I do it despite good
> > > results, that's controlling her finances, and that's also an ACT OF
> > VIOLENCE
> > > against her.
> > >
> > > And for every woman I meet, whether I like her or not, she is still in
> > some
> > > kind of a committed relationship with another man. Given these social
> and
> > > legal conditions, is she worth fighting over with another man? Let
him
> > keep
> > > her. I'll take the Monastery, thank you. My relationship with God in
> > Jesus
> > > Christ is VASTLY more important to me than a sexual relationship with
> some
> > > woman.
> > >
> > > Meanwhile, I pray that what happened to me by my ex-wife during my
> former
> > > marriage would happen to you so you would learn well the lesson John
> > Knight
> > > and I have gently tried to teach you. Because of Battered Women's
> > Shelters
> > > and VAWA, growing numbers of heterosexual men now want NOTHING more to
> do
> > > with women at all. They'd rather vomit than make love. I guess
> celibacy
> > > isn't such a bad thing after all, is it? It keeps me and thousands of
> > other
> > > sadder but wiser men out of jail for merely making love.
> > >
> > > Sincerely,
> > >
> > > Richard C. August
> > > Free, MALE, Celibate and loving it!!
> >
> > Wahh wahh wahh wahh....you don't see me complaining about the bad
> > experiences I've had with certain men.
> >
> > Why don't you do us all a favor and spend some time and money on
> > psychotherapy to resolve your obvious problems?
> >
> > This has nothing whatsoever to do with the original subject. If you
> insist
> > on whining about your problems, try some of the self-help psychology
> groups.
> >
> > The Shadow Dancer
> >
> >
>>
