"Kenneth Collins" <k.p.collins at worldnet.att.net> wrote in message news:<dFc%8.82$pg2.7153 at bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>...
> mat wrote in message <43525ce3.0207230242.638247e1 at posting.google.com>...
> >> you know, Peter, taken by itself, NDT's reification of the phenomenon of
> >> "decussation" is the most-significant result that's ever been produced in
> >> all of Science.
> >
> >do you actually know what decussation is?
>> i wrote the book on it.
so self-assured again. not 'a' book but 'the' book
> when i sent AoK out, it usually came back into my hands within three days.
> that means someone in the mailroom was the only one 'deciding' on it. i
> doubt it was ever read.
did you enclose a letter claiming it was the greatest achievement in
all of science? you might want to tone it down a little as people
usually take afront to someone claiming so much having shown so
little.
> >Please enlighten as to how you know this? Given his supposed
> >omnipotence I would have thought that knowing how the brain works
> >would not be hard, especially as he is also supposed to have been
> >amongst those who designed it.
>> well, for instance, last night, as almost always, i read the following days
> _Old and _New Testament_ Scriptural readings. only, since my near vision is
> 'going down the tubes', i 'saw' "Mat" 7: 14-15, 18-20, instead of the actual
> "Mi" 7: 14-15, 18-20.
>> Mat.7: 14-15:"Enter through the narrow gate: for the gate is wide and the
> road broad that leads to destruction, and those who enter through it are
> many. How narrow the gate, and constricted the road that leads to life. And
> those who find it are few."
>> there, in a 'nutshell', exists a =Perfect= metaphorical statement of what's
> important with respect to TD E/I-minimization.
metaphorical hmmm. you might also consider that it has nothing to do
with your ideas and that is your very abstracted interpretation that
leads you to conclude that he is talking about TD E/I or whatever.
but no, of course he's directy addressing you and your ideas.
>> it's just not practical to write a Neuroanatomy text in little snippets in
> an online discussion 'place'.
didn't think so, it always seems that to actually explain you couldn't
write it here, instead we get a load of rubbish on 'people must be
good' 'companies must benefit society' 'we must honour truth' and
other such happy-clappy flower-power ideas that you actually think you
originated.
>> one follows the one 'map' of WDB2T over the course of =long= experience.
is this some reference to the second law of thermodynamics?
>> when one strays from WDB2T, TD E/I(up) happens, and vice versa.
how can anything stray from the laws of thermodynamics?
