"Jet" <thatjetnospam at yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:3D3A5859.B7212C46 at yahoo.com...
>>> John Knight wrote:
> >
> > "OhSojourner" <ohsojourner at aol.com> wrote in message
> > news:ce660175.0207201519.32325665 at posting.google.com...> >
> > > Both you and Mr. Knight are attempting to maintain that because of
> > > these "averages", either the exceptional individuals must apparently
> > > not exist; their feats and accomplishments are invalid for one reason
> > > or another, or that it's dangerous to society to suggest that their
> > > birth-group as a whole be allowed to have open access to certain
> > > opportunities, privileges, freedoms and rights.
> > >
> > > ...So, in other words, you are trying to use these averages to justify
> > > bigotry against individuals NO MATTER THEIR CAPABILITY.
> > >
> >
> > It's hard to tell if you're just too STUPID to be able to comprehend a
> > single word that was posted, or if you post such things just to attempt
to
> > confuse the issue. Either way, they sure are great debate tactics,
aren't
> > they?
> >
> > So this reply isn't for you--it's only to set the record straight.
> >
> > NOBODY claims that "exceptional individuals must apparently not exist".
> > This is a LIE. We are the ones noting that exceptional individuals DO
> > exist. The point you don't seem to grasp, or don't want to admit, is
that
> > the real exceptional individuals aren't getting recognition because
> > affirmative action hirees are handed all the resources on a silver
platter,
> > which does nobody any good.
> >
> > In terms of intellectual accomplishments, the high scores of East Asians
> > suggests that they should have most of the exceptional individuals, and
> > their recent accomplishments in technology, family incomes, social
> > stability, and personal savings is entirely consistent. They are so far
up
> > the curve, that the most exceptional White American women don't even
reach
> > their median scores, which is a very good indication that there's
something
> > awry about all this hooplah about Curie and Hopper. GRE shows that the
> > upper sixth of American White women score 632, which is 11 points LOWER
than
> > the median Asians in the US, and they score much lower than Asians in
Asia
> > [read: the very brightest White American women are the dull knives in
the
> > drawer compared to the MEDIAN Asian man].
> >
> > We actually do know what you mean by "bigotry against individuals NO
MATTER
> > THEIR CAPABILITY". What you mean is that, no matter how low American
girls
> > scored in TIMSS Math and Science, regardless of the fact that they
scored
> > lower than if they'd just guessed on ONE third of TIMSS physics
problems,
> > even though the creme de la creme of women who took GRE quantitative
scored
> > 127 points lower than Asian men--it's only because of "bigotry" that
women
> > don't get 50% of all patents rather than 4%.
>> What do you have to say about the fact you can't answer any of the
> questions you took girls to task for not being able to answer?
>> Here's a really simple one:
>http://christianparty.net/timssh04.htm>> Brian got it wrong, he thought the objects started out at the same
> height and you don't have a clue.
>> J
What kind of a moron could you possibly be to presume that the person who
supplied the test scores and the original problems and the test answers in
the first place "can't answer any of the questions"?
This is called "negative knowledge". You have all the data and evidence you
need to answer the question correctly, but you instead get the *wrong*
answer, even when you've quoted some of the data and evidence yourself.
For example, you also presumed that .25x = .30, you acknowledged that this
would make x = 1.2, you admitted that you knew that x = .92 and not 1.2, and
you STILL couldn't get the correct answer, and instead wrote: "Sorry, dumb
ass, I scored in the top 2% on the GRE math test. And I can answer H04".
Please tell us how this statement is going to help you solve this simple
problem, which STILL isn't even as complicated as an algebra, addition or
subtraction, or multiplication or division problem? You haven't even
advanced to that stage yet, and here you are LYING about your test scores,
as if though you "think" this has something to do with solving the problem!
It has utterly nothing to do with it.
Is it your debate tactic to LIE about your test scores so that your flock of
feminazis will just take your word for it, hope that they'll just go along
with your program--and keep them ignorant for the rest of their lives?
The CORRECT answer is that x = 93 1/3%. Why couldn't you even figure this
out? Why do you keep insisting that .25x = .30, when you were handed the
answer on a silver platter?
What is it about your arrogance that, after a week of being unable to solve
the problem, you were GIVEN all the proper details on a silver platter, yet
you STILL can't solve for "x"?
People need to know. They need to understand what it is about feminazis
that they never seem to comprehend some of the simplest points. This
emotional grab bag of false feminazi claims has just got to come to an end.
John Knight
