"Jen Larson" <straycat at udel.edu> wrote in message
news:3D3C4A2F.A791E17B at udel.edu...
>>> John Knight wrote:
> >
> > "Jen Larson" <straycat at udel.edu> wrote in message
> > news:3D3AC1CD.A00CDD37 at udel.edu...>> > > Good, this should give women incentive to improve themselves and quit
> > > thinking that they are entitled to a man's money because she will only
> > > .uck him and no other men.
>> > Then you don't mind if men keep their hard earned money, and leave women
to
> > earn theirs on their own, with NO welfare, NO AFDC, NO social security
paid
> > for exclusively with men's dollars, NO medicare (ditto), NO "tax
credits"
> > like EITC which exceeds the total contribution of women to the IRS by
$98
> > billion, NO "child support", and not one single dollar ever earned by a
man?
>> > That's what we've been waiting to hear!
>> I'm fine with all of that John. As long as men are held to 50/50 joint
> physical custody of children I am _TOTALLY_ cool with _ALL_ of the
> above!
Ah, but this is a putative Christian nation, which requires 100% father
custody.
Should make you adulteresses real happy, eh?
John Knight
