hi Peter.
i =understand= that acknowledging Jesus's Priority is a 'costly' thing to
do, especially within the realm of Science.
i also understand that such 'costs' are 100% artificially-created, as a
function of tacit 'rules' that're imposed upon folks who'd do work in
Science, as 'prerequisites' of being 'received' within the group[s] which
adhere[s] to the illusory 'rules'.
i also understand that all real Costs derive in 'moving away from' Truth.
so, if it's plain-as-day to me, and it is, that Jesus Understood how nervous
systems process-information, and that He taught from such Understanding, i'd
be a Deceiver, Liar, Plagerist, etc., if i didn't acknowledge Jesus'
Priority.
more-important is that i'd, then, be, through Choice, 'moving away from'
Truth.
i just don't do such.
you know, Peter, taken by itself, NDT's reification of the phenomenon of
"decussation" is the most-significant result that's ever been produced in
all of Science.
yet, i've not been allowed to publish this reification, and, although i've
asked to be allowed to come to folks' places to discuss it, i've not been
allowed to do so.
it's easy to See that there's Prejudice operating in-there.
which is where it becomes very-important to acknowledge Jesus, because the
'problem' that's 'stymied' the coming-forward of this Precious understanding
exists 'outside' the realm of traditional Science, but, nevertheless,
Dictates to folks who work in Science what it 'is' that they 'can' and
'cannot' do.
Jesus addressed this Dictatorial stuff.
and when one follows Jesus' lead, one escapes the Dictatorial stuff, and,
voila, one is able to just do Science.
you'll note that i've never tried to 'explain' how it could be that ~2000
years ago, Jesus Knew how nervous systems process information, all i'm
capable of is seeing that it's so.
i've Seen such with my own eyes, right in the experimentally-verified neural
topology and it's functioning.
for instance, the need for forgiveness is built-right-into nervous systems
because they learn through experience, and experience most-often misleads,
but such only becomes detectable subsequently.
without Forgiveness, one is 'trapped' within the mis-take.
Jesus also addressed the way old-familiar stuff is unlikely to give-way to
new-unfamiliar stuff ["new wine is for new wineskins"], which, Darwin
lamented in his _Origin of Species_ [Darwin's lament is quoted in AoK's
'Short Paper' section.]
and it goes on and on like this.
when one 'allows' one's self to See it, one's jaw, flat-out, hangs-down.
to me, it's just a matter of Scientific Honor.
yeah, i could've long-ago 'gotten-rich', if only i'd've 'put on blinders'
with respect to Jesus' Priority ['moved away from' it].
but it was already old-long-since that i'd come to understand the
Consequences inherent in 'moving away from' Truth.
to the degree that one 'moves away from' Truth, one becomes incapable of
actually doing anything Real.
'moving away from' Truth, in fact, to the degree of such, cast one outside
of Reality [i don't expect anyone to understand this. it's Deep.]
and, i expect, if i'd 'prevaricated' with respect to that which i'd
Witnessed, through my own eyes, perhaps i'd've been admitted to the 'club',
but what good would've such accomplished? surely, if i'd've been
'wishy-washy' with respect to Truth, i'd not've been able to achieve NDT's
synthesis. there's so much in-there that id've surely 'gotten-lost', without
being able to achieve NDT's unity.
so, if 'the way things are' casts me out because i acknowledge Jesus'
Priority, that's just be-cause 'the way things are' is 'afraid' of
re-entering Reality.
it's a Sorrow to see so many finding so Consequential a "stumbling block" in
Jesus.
but it's not my problem.
i 'move toward' Truth.
Period.
it's why i can accept any peer-reviewed, replicable, experimental results as
Tests of the work i've done. it's why i can enhance any such experimental
results and predict the yield of the enhanced experiments.
folks'll just have to Forgive me if i Choose not to 'move away from' that
which enables such.
or not Forgive me.
i Guard Free WIll.
if such makes me 'in-EPT', then, i'll Revel in my 'in-EPT'-ness, giving only
more, while Life remains in-me.
'hurts' some, but that TD E/I(up) stuff will only make-possible further TD
E/I-minimization :-)
ken [k. p. collins]
PF wrote in message ...
>The *very aspect* of human evolution, brain function, and behaviour that I
>know and have simply (though with injections of sEPTic humour and
>self-seductive sem_antics) defined and explained to be "most missing" in
>conventional academic anthropobiological analyses is also "most missing" in
>your AoK.
>>It is symptomatic of this your 'inEPTness' (a remark with a restrained
>reference to that I have come to name my explanation "EPT") that you rely
on
>*religious irrationality* within your brand of "being (and having become)
>AEVASIVE".
>>NB! I have not claimed that your AoK approach is *otherwise* wrong or
>without merits.
>>Examples of this your 'inEPTness', abound below:
>>"Kenneth Collins" <k.p.collins at worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
>news:dmJZ8.37674$Iu6.2149323 at bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...>> >>> and, yes, when i read of Jesus saying, [paraphrase] "If this or that
>is
>> >your
>> >>> problem, get rid of it.", i see Him saying it with a 'twinkle' in His
>> >eye,
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >>or twinkie maybe
>> >>
>> >>> because He was, simultaneously, addressing nervous system function,
>and
>> >>> Infinitely-more. i'm Convinced Jesus Knew how our nervous systems
>> process
>> >>> information.
>> >>
>> >>well if one is to believe that we are his creation then one might hope
>> >>he knew what he was doing. you would do well as a minister or priest
>> >>or something where suspect interpretation and extreme metaphorical
>> >>license are mainstays of reading what seems to me as relatively plain
>> >>english
>> >>
>> >>> here, He was directly addressing TD E/I-minimization,
>> >>
>> >>oh right, probably without using any of those exact words eh? clever
>> >>that.
>> >
>> >i'd say "i stand on what i've posted", but you'd "buzz" me, so,
>hopefully,
>> >for the last 'time'(?), i'll reiterate, a bit.
>> >in this actuality, there's the necessity to explore the larger stuff.
>> which,
>> >with respect to the Word of Christ, is what i do.
>> >
>> >"fundamentalist' interpretations get-into-trouble because they 'stop at
>the
>> >interface'.
>> >
>> >often, with Tragic results with respect to which most folks are
familiar.
>> >
>> >>> and i saw Jesus' Love for Humanity. think about it. there was, then,
>no
>> >way
>> >>> anyone could understand the physical-reality correlates, yet Jesus
>laid
>> >it
>> >>> all out.
>>>
