John Knight wrote:
>> "Jen Larson" <straycat at udel.edu> wrote in message
> news:3D3AC1CD.A00CDD37 at udel.edu...
> > Good, this should give women incentive to improve themselves and quit
> > thinking that they are entitled to a man's money because she will only
> > .uck him and no other men.
> Then you don't mind if men keep their hard earned money, and leave women to
> earn theirs on their own, with NO welfare, NO AFDC, NO social security paid
> for exclusively with men's dollars, NO medicare (ditto), NO "tax credits"
> like EITC which exceeds the total contribution of women to the IRS by $98
> billion, NO "child support", and not one single dollar ever earned by a man?
> That's what we've been waiting to hear!
I'm fine with all of that John. As long as men are held to 50/50 joint
physical custody of children I am _TOTALLY_ cool with _ALL_ of the
above!
