Dear Bob,
Would you want to reproduce with a woman who has probably had about 5 or
more men in her sexual life before she even met you? Remember, the question
among teen girls is no longer "How do you spell
antidisestablishmentarianism?" or "What is the square root of 3 divided by
2?" or "How did you manage to ace that test, since that teacher is such a
hardnose?" The question is, "You're 14 and you're still a virgin? Doesn't
anybody like you?"
Wait until some one of these women, your wife included, pulls a VAWA stunt
on you, such as accusing you of abusing her when you didn't even talk to
her. Yup, that's called giving her the "silent treatment", and according to
VAWA 1, that's a federal abuse charge against her. Or wait until you and
wifey sit down to figure a budget, and because you don't agree with her that
this money should go here instead of there, she calls the Women's Shelter
because you are controlling "her" income, causing "her" to be distressed
because "she" can't spend "her" money the way she wants. Never mind that
she buys 20 pairs of socks or a glockenspiel when you more badly need the
car repaired or to get groceries. It's "her" money.
This actually happened to many men reading this post. Women can and will
and do falsely accuse men of abusing them when in fact, they actually
STARTED the abuse. It got so I can't even touch a woman without fear of
repercussion, lest she accuse me of touching her inappropriately. Thus, I
hardly touch a woman at all, and feel MUCH BETTER for it.
Get it through your skull before your wife or daughter pulls VAWA on you.
How long will we let VAWA abuse US before we ALL learn that women no longer
want men as husbands, but as playthings? Boys will be toys, as they say,
and this MAN has pulled HIMSELF out of the toybox. I am now OFF LIMITS to
women, and likewise, women have been placed OFF LIMITS to me. Wait until
your wife plays with you, pal. Wait until she rips you apart from your
family under a false accusation of abuse when you did and said nothing to
her other than be yourself.
Here's another clue about the lies women offer. Last evening, I hit
http://www.hotornot.com to look at some of the women's postings there. I
saw a woman there who called herself a "Christian" according to her keyword.
She was pictured kneeling at her bedside wearing a low-cut shirt. Her arms
were spread wide open, revealing her cleavage. Her left hand very
prominently sported a WEDDING RING. Political Correctness calls this
"married but looking". God's Word, The Bible, calls this ADULTERY, a sin
against God reflected in the Second Table of the Ten Commandments. Do we
want women like that? Do YOU want a woman like that? For that matter, why
should I bother wanting women at all, much less women for whom
"Christianity" is nothing but a KEYWORD with no spiritual meaning?
Granted, the photo was replaced with another much less clear photo of the
same woman. Nevertheless, she is there. Her left hand is now hidden. Is
she HOT? NOT!!!
Hey, Bob, do you want to be "married but looking"? Are you "hot or not"?
Feminism wants you to be that way. God wants you to be otherwise.
Therefore, since God wants otherwise for my life, too, I refuse to be a toy
boy for some boy toy. I refuse a girlfriend and have told women so. Do I
want an adulteress that will abuse me? Shall I put up with that again?
Sincerely,
Richard C. August
"Bob LeChevalier" <lojbab at lojban.org> wrote in message
news:1m0hjuspa6dlkhm6pjl0bgp2272g5r1mk5 at 4ax.com...
> "Richard C. August" <raugust at ptd.net> wrote:
> >Please, let us not forget that most of these "scores" on these "tests"
were
> > determined FALSELY either by grading on a curve or by "recentering" the
> > scores, which is EXACTLY what the College Board did with SAT scores and
> > which, very likely, is what the TIMSS revisions of late did as well.
>> Actually ALL normed standardized test are "graded on a curve", and are
> renormed regularly. That is the DEFINITION of a normed standardized test.
>> The renorming is valid, because these tests are not generally intended to
> measure changes in performance over time, though people insist on doing so
> despite their inappropriateness for that purpose.
>> >But thanks to them, and jackbooted Feminazis like YOU, we men no longer
want
> > to have girlfriends, much less marry.
>> Speak for yourself. I am happily married.
>> Good. It means that YOUR kind will not reproduce.
>> >We desire to serve God Almighty as good men and husbands. Thanks to
> > feminism, VAWA 1 and 2, pornography, the TIMSS scores, "recentering",
and
> > women in the workplace, we cannot.
>> Blame it on others that you do not fulfill your responsibilities? How
> juvenile!
>> >SOooooooo, we end up in monasteries.......
>> Good riddance.
>> >Meanwhile, I guess you gals just have to suffer without us.
>> I doubt that any girl will suffer for not having YOU around.
>> >Shall I go on???
>> Rant and rave to your heart's content. But don't expect to convince
anyone
> who doesn't already believe what you believe.
>> lojbab
