"John Knight" <johnknight at usa.com> wrote in message
news:hXD_8.14209$Fq6.1280943 at news2.west.cox.net...
>> "Jen Larson" <straycat at udel.edu> wrote in message
> news:3D3AC1CD.A00CDD37 at udel.edu...> >
> >
> > John Knight wrote:
> > >
> > > "Jen Larson" <straycat at udel.edu> wrote in message
> > > news:3D37FDBA.AB894599 at udel.edu...> >
> > > > That is just a real shame. Marriage no longer has incentive as it
did
> > > > for women because being economically controlled is b-a-d, now the
> judges
> > > > are making it economically b-a-d for men good I'm not into
"marriage"
> as
> > > > the be-all end all of life, life is for living in full force not
being
> > > > restricted, too bad you don't understand what freedom for all is,
you
> > > > are a tyranical bastard from hell who is like a pestulant sickness
on
> a
> > > > slow breeze you are seen for miles and precautions have been taken
to
> > > > neutralize your infiltration to health.
> >
> >
> > > The biggest losers in this breakdown of the family have been women,
not
> just
> > > because of the two-thirds plunge in American "family" incomes
(dropping
> them
> > > from a solid first place to a shaky 17th place in per worker income in
> just
> > > the last 3 decades), but because the most financially destitute
> households
> > > are single women with children, followed immediately by single women
> with no
> > > children.
> >
> > Good, this should give women incentive to improve themselves and quit
> > thinking that they are entitled to a man's money because she will only
> > .uck him and no other men.
> >
>> Then you don't mind if men keep their hard earned money, and leave women
to
> earn theirs on their own, with NO welfare, NO AFDC, NO social security
paid
> for exclusively with men's dollars, NO medicare (ditto), NO "tax credits"
> like EITC which exceeds the total contribution of women to the IRS by $98
> billion, NO "child support", and not one single dollar ever earned by a
man?
>> That's what we've been waiting to hear!
Gods you do a lousy job of twisting words around to suit your ends. Did it
ever occur to you that a good half of those programs you named benefit men
as well as women? That means that you're advocating taking away resources
from your fellow man, more than a few of which are Anglo like yourself.
Sheesh. Try again.
The Shadow Dancer
