"OhSojourner" <ohsojourner at aol.com> wrote in message
news:ce660175.0207201056.3bce0dba at posting.google.com...
> "Thalamus" <zhil at online.no> wrote in message
news:<GnXZ8.639$Py1.11352 at news2.ulv.nextra.no>...
> > "Jet" <thatjetnospam at yahoo.com> skrev i melding
> > news:3D37C00B.743DB7E3 at yahoo.com...> > > I do algebra just fine, much, much better than you. I'm not the one
> > > claiming that .75x=70% and .25x=30%.
> > >
> > > You can't answer question H04.
> > >
> > > As soon as I pointed these things out, you had nothing left but to
call
> > > me nigger, and post irrelevant stats.
> >
> > I think that this can hardly be called irrelevant:
> > http://nces.ed.gov/pubs98/condition98/c9818a01.html> > And I'll humiliate you totally, for read THIS:
> > "Average mathematics proficiency (scale score) by race/ethnicity and
age:
> > 1973-1996
> > White Black
> > Hispanic
> > Year Age9 Age13 Age17 Age9 Age13 Age17 Age9 Age13 Age17
> > 1973 225 274 310 190 228 270 202 239 277
> > 1978 224 272 306 192 230 268 203 238 276
> > 1982 224 274 304 195 240 272 204 252 277
> > 1986 227 274 308 202 249 279 205 254 283
> > 1990 235 276 310 208 250 289 214 255 284
> > 1992 235 279 312 208 250 286 212 259 292
> > 1994 237 281 312 212 252 286 210 256 291
> > 1996 237 281 312 212 252 286 215 256
292"
> >
> > Now, it seems that the nigger achieved as an 17-year old on par with
White
> > 13-year old kids (IE check the numbers for 1973,1978 and 1982).
> > It seems that they in fact have achieved a little better than those
pesky
> > 13-year old White kids later on, but the divide is still there.
> >
> <snip disturbed racist rantings>
>> Great heeber-jeebies, but you're stupid. Averages say nothing about a
> specific individual.
>> You say you're a Mensan? What else are you going to claim -- that
> you're also Napolean lll from the Planet Zambodia?
>> <snip rest of racist bigotry>
This IS getting a bit repetitive and ridiculous, isn't it?
...Shadow Dancer, who is still laughing
