As I've seen firsthand, and from the TV, those bitches that calls themselves
feminists, seems to believe the crap that they otherwise would reject if
they used their brains (objectively).
What is WRONG with them, really ?
Well, from what I've seen, it's a European streak; which White European
males also possess; and that is called ALTRUISM.
Main Entry: al·tru·ism
Pronunciation: 'al-tru-"i-z&m
Etymology: French altruisme, from autrui other people, from Old French,
oblique case form of autre other, from Latin alter
Date: 1853
1 : unselfish regard for or devotion to the welfare of others
2 : behavior by an animal that is not beneficial to or may be harmful to
itself but that benefits others of its species
- al·tru·ist /-tru-ist/ noun
- al·tru·is·tic /"al-tru-'is-tik/ adjective
- al·tru·is·ti·cal·ly /-ti-k(&-)lE/ adverb
On the other hand, I've shown myself as brutal and unforgiving as possible,
but these traits remain, as I would protect my own family with destructive
consequences against ANY stupid enough to fuck around with them.
So, the feminists have STOLEN the USE of this trait, as in WHERE is it
directed.
Before X-insanity; it was directed towards the nearest family, the extended
family and the tribe/race.
Now it is directed against those who would see our tribe destroyed (ever
heard what the gangsta-rappers are saying /singing? It is usually 'Kill
Whitey').
What about culture ?
Cultur is just the expression of the inborn traits of any particular people.
So obviously it isn't culture that binds the people together, but rather the
genetic similarity.
If you study who you hang out with, and if you exclude those you consider
'well-known', but not friends, you'll see what your preferences are.
Who are you hanging out with ?
Most people that I have encountered (without displaying my racial
preference), hangs out with similar people; and this fact is undisputable.
Only a small minority among the various tribes hang out inter-racially;
usually centered around a common theme; in the culture of today (mixed as it
is) it also include unhealthy lifestyles as using drugs (read: recreational
drugs; ectasy, hyper etc.).
So, one part of the inter-racial connection seems to be the 'advantage' of
getting dope in an easy way.
Now, I don't mind that the weaker part of my tribe is siphoned off, for the
betterment of my race.
But I would rather like that to happen outside of my European homeland.
In fact, things are happening rappidly here in Europe, and I am very
encouraged with the stunt they tried to pull in France regarding the
elections.
They had to practically BUY voters to stall Jean-Marie Le Pen !!
In Austria we have a strong foothold, same in Denmark and Germany as they
are throwing off their intellectual shackels.
Hopefully the females will recognize what the feminist-bunch for what they
really are, after all - how will females fare in a multi-racial society;
without any protection (particularly against the 'racism'-label) ?
The baby-rapes in South-Africa, the Lebanese gang-rapers in Australia (not
racially motivated stated by the judge, but formally complained by one of
the victims as racially motivated).
Aren't these signs that females shouldn't embrace the unknown before they
know exactly what they're up against ?
Well, I think we will see a couple of trends soon, one is the liberation of
feminism.
Real feminism; the one which doesn't demand to be equal on par with males,
the one that doesn't thrash our brothers, because what is a tribe without
it's females ?
Brian
http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2002/07/13/1026185124700.html
Racist rapes: Finally the truth comes out
By Miranda Devine
July 14 2002
So now we know the facts, straight from the Supreme Court, that a group of
Lebanese Muslim gang rapists from south-western Sydney hunted their victims
on the basis of their ethnicity and subjected them to hours of degrading,
dehumanising torture. The young women, and girls as young as 14, were
"sluts" and "Aussie pigs", the rapists said. So now that some of the
perpetrators are in jail, will those people who cried racism and media
"sensationalism" hang their heads in shame? Hardly.
The journalists, academics, legal brains and politicians who tried to claim
last August that the gang rapes of south-western Sydney were just a
run-of-the-mill police blotter story being beaten up by racists,
scaremongers and political opportunists don't ever want to acknowledge the
truth about that ugly episode in Australian history. They don't want to
acknowledge the fear and tension that ran through a part of Sydney they
rarely visit and can never understand.
This newspaper was the first to report the story, which had been common
knowledge in police and media circles, and it has never censored the race
element.
Even last week, with the conviction of two brothers for their part in the
gang rape of Miss D, who was 16 when she was held at gunpoint in a Greenacre
park, there were media outlets that downplayed the story and air-brushed
race from it.
Yet the victims have been crying out for the truth to be told. In court on
Friday, one victim gave another a card on which she had written
"Truth is Justice".
In August, when Judge Megan Latham handed out laughably lenient sentences to
three men in one gang rape case, which were later more than doubled on
appeal, she made a special point of debunking the race link: "There is no
evidence before me of any racial element in the commission of these
offences," she said. "There is nothing said or done by the offenders which
provides the slightest basis for imputing to them some discrimination in
terms of the nationality of their victims."
Except that later one of the victims complained her victim impact statement
had been "censored" of any "ethnic" references by prosecutors intent on a
plea bargain. She was convinced she was raped because of her ethnicity. "You
deserve it because you're an Australian," the rapists told her during the
five-hour attack.
It's just so inconvenient of the victims to insist on telling the truth.
"I looked in his eyes. I had never seen such indifference," one 18-year-old
victim, codenamed Miss C, told the court, remembering one of the 14 men who
called her "Aussie pig", gang raped her 25 times over a six-hour period in
Bankstown and Chullora, and then turned a hose on her. "I'm going to f***
you Leb style," he said.
Fourteen gang rapists have been convicted, or pleaded guilty, thanks to the
courage of seven victims who testified for days in court as their tormentors
smirked nearby, the men's families threatened them and defence lawyers
suggested they had enjoyed the rapes.
"They're very brave, very strong and very courageous young women," said
Salvation Army Major Joyce Harmer, who held the hands of many of the victims
through the trials. "They knew this was something they had to do."
There were encouraging signs by the end of the week that some Muslim
community leaders were talking of "Muslims accepting responsibility that
they may have failed to do things that would have prevented these things
from happening", as Amjad Mehboob, chief executive for the Federation of
Islamic Councils, told ABC Radio on Friday.
Keysar Trad, vice-president of the Lebanese Muslim Association, said: "It is
certainly a disgrace to our community that people who were born to a Muslim
family would commit such heinous crimes." But he went on to say it was
"rather unfair" that the rapists' ethnicity had been reported "because these
boys themselves have completely disaffiliated themselves from their culture
or their religion".
Yes, it is unfair that the vast bulk of law-abiding Lebanese Muslim boys and
men should be smeared by association. But their temporary discomfort may be
necessary so that the powerful social tool of shame is applied to the
families and communities that nurtured the rapists, gave them succour and
brought them up with such a hatred of Australia's dominant culture and
contempt for its women that they think of an 18-year-old girl, dressed for a
job interview in her best suit, sitting on a train reading a book, as a
slut.
These were racist crimes. They were hate crimes. The rapists chose their
victims on the basis of race. That fact is crucial to this story. If the
perpetrators had been Anglo-Celtic Australians, the furore would have been
enormous. No newspaper would have left out that fact and you can bet the
guilt and shame would have been spread far and wide.
Captain who went overboard
You have to feel sorry for Commander Richard Farrington, the captain of the
Royal Navy ship which ran into a rock off Lord Howe Island last week. His
career is sunk, he faces a court martial and he is the laughing stock of
England. The Sun newspaper nicknamed him Captain Clod.
"This is not a good day for me," he said. "This is quite the worst thing
that has ever happened, quite the worst. Character-building stuff."
There were photos of him, weeping, in the most wretched way, in front of a
delegation of men from the British High Commission.
They were classic portraits of male emotional awkwardness.
Farrington, 41, stands with head bowed, the heel of his hand scrunching at
his eyes, his mouth twisted with anguish. It's hard to be sure, but it looks
as if great wrenching sobs might have added to the pathos.
Seven men surround him, all keeping their distance, as if they're waiting
politely for him to pull himself together. British naval captains aren't
supposed to cry, even when their careers are flashing before their eyes.
Poor Farrington wasn't even on board when the ship set course for Wolfe
Rock, so named for the last British ship it sunk. He deserves a big hug, not
least for giving us something to laugh about.
devinemiranda at hotmail.com
