johnknight at usa.com (John Knight) wrote:
>Brian is most likely intelligent enough to be able to tear your STUPID
>statement to shreds.
Not likely.
>Your statement has nothing whatsoever to do with the subject at hand,
You should be the LAST person to talk, O changer-of-subjects-whenever-the-
subject-gets-too-hot-for-you.
>and it's in fact a misleading statement (I would
>have said "intentionally misleading", but you don't seem to have the
>brains to comprehend why).
That a nincompoop like you is easily misled is understandable.
>You don't seem to even comprehend what an 'average' is.
Look in a mirror and say that.
>This isn't a
>personality contest, this is a social commentary about a scientific
>study which says NOTHING about individuals, at all.
It isn't scientific, but that's beside the point.
Then you cannot make any statements about individuals as a result of your
data about averages. Yet you CONSTANTLY do so. Do you need quotes?
lojbab
