"John Knight" <johnknight at usa.com> wrote:
>> "At two, humans have the most brain cells that they will ever have in their
>> lifetime. If these cells are not used, they are simply deleted."
>>http://students.ou.edu/I/Feather.K.Inman-1/concepts.html>>>> "We now know that an infant's brain contains 100 billion cells, the most
>> brain cells a person will ever have."
>>http://www.nccic.org/pubs/mirrors/intro.html>>>> How did infants score on your test, John? According to your theory, since
>> they have more brain cells than either men or women, they should have scored
>> much higher than either category.
>>You could only make such a silly observation if you lacked 3 1/2 billion
>brain cells from the start, which is the point: male babies also have 3 1/2
>billion more brain cells than female babies, just as adult males have 3 1/2
>billion more than adult females.
How do you know? Did you measure the brain sizes of babies?
Now observe the above - that two year olds have the most brain cells that
they will ever have in their life. Now consider the size of a two year old's
head, which is significantly smaller than that of almost every single adult,
male or female. There is no possibility that a two year old has a larger
brain than an adult, yet they have more brain cells. Yet you claim that
there is a high correlation between brain size and number of brain cells.
Clearly, you are WRONG.
But what else is new?
>> A team from McMaster University, Ontario, Canada, found that women have up
>> to 15% more brain cell density in certain areas of the frontal lobe, which
>> controls so-called higher mental processes. "
>>Is this why men score 18-50% higher than women on ever test ever devised,
>across races, nations, and continents, and have since Day One?
When did you stop beating your wife, nincompoop?
>Did you even notice that this completely ignores performance? Just because
>half the students sitting in a classroom is women is not proof of anything
>except their ability to waddle to class and plant their big fat as.es in a
>chair. Just because those teachers give girls a letter grade higher than
>they give boys (who score a standard deviation higher than on ALL
>*objective* tests),
Maybe the "objective" tests are the ones that are in error?
>is proof that those teachers are too STUPID to even
>detect such huge differences in performance.
Or maybe women perform better in the classroom and in day to day living, but
men perform better on tests, but FAIL in everyday living.
Which gender has a higher percentage that failed to graduate high school?
Men.
>Can you even imagine the mentality of a teacher teaching children all her
>life, never knowing that all boys across the world, throughout history,
>across all races, score a full standard deviation higher than girls in many
>subjects?
Yes. We would call such a mentality "sane", as compared to you who are not.
>Why should we even permit such ignorant "teachers" to get anywhere near our
>children?
Because we prefer sane teachers.
>> "Neanderthals had larger brains than we do, she pointed out, but obviously
>> they weren't smarter."
>>How does she know that? Did she test Neanderthal? He left behind some
>excellent art,
He did? (And how do you know it was a "he" that made that art? Maybe the
men were all out hunting, while the women were "barefoot in the cave"
painting the walls?)
>something that not a single nigger in Africa, with very small
>brains, were ever able to accomplish.
I suggest that you visit the Smithsonian Museum of African Art sometime, and
disabuse yourself of this notion.
>Why are you quoting these typical nonsensical feminazi statements?
Because they have more credibility than YOUR typical nincompoop statements.
>As already noted above
>in your other absurd, silly, nonsensical, uneducated, ignorant, illogical
>statement, it takes PRECISELY the same amount of memory, computer power, and
>brain cells to operate a human male baby's body as it does to operate an
>adult male body.
How would you know?
>Also note that Wechsler found that men far outperform women on the 94% of
>the "IQ problems" which he eliminated from his "IQ test",
A false statement. Wechsler omitted NO problems on his test. You (as usual)
failed to understand what you were told.
>Which ignores that this difference in construction is precisely why men have
>a 42% advantage over women in hand/eye-oriented Olympic events like
>springboard,
Springboard diving is judged subjectively, and women and men are not judged
according to the same standards, nor necessarily by the same judges.
Furthermore, much of springboard diving is based on muscle strength and body
size.
lojbab
