JDay123 at BellSouth.com (Jd) wrote:
>Quit fooling around with Satan.
Satan is not relevant to this discussion, except in your mind.
>Adam, being the head of household,
Non-biblical. There is no indication that there was a "household", much less
a "head" thereof. In the Garden of Eden, before eating the apple, there was
no need for either households or heads thereof.
>At any rate, it's not "sexist" to uphold the biblical model of
>authority as it should exist in a familial context.
Oh, it most certainly IS sexist. Whether it is "right" or "wrong" may be a
religious issue, but whether it is sexist or not is logico-semantic based on
the definition of the word.
>It's anti
>christian to impose the secular doctrines of disorder and false
>authority spawned by shrinks and wizards... upon America.
Only in your mind.
>Why all these women so miffed at Mr. Knight for expressing his views?
Because he is a nincompoop.
>Apparently they have never learned that not all men can be
>bossed around ...
You mean like Adam was when Eve told him to eat the apple?
lojbab
