IUBio

brain sizes: Einstein's and women's

Shadow Dancer insomniac at winterslight.org
Thu Jul 18 17:11:06 EST 2002


"John Knight" <johnknight at usa.com> wrote in message
news:HsGZ8.7452$Fq6.537516 at news2.west.cox.net...
>
> "Jen Larson" <straycat at udel.edu> wrote in message
> news:3D359607.24436484 at udel.edu...
> >
> >
> > John Knight wrote:
> > >
> > > "Jen Larson" <straycat at udel.edu> wrote in message
> > > news:3D332AA5.2876A76E at udel.edu...
> >
> > > > Yup. Women benefitted by being recognized as fully human citizens
with
> > > > the same inalienable rights that men have.
> >
> > > And what were you before "feminism" set in--half-humans?
> >
> > Yup, woman-child governed by man-adult.
> >
> >
> > > The problem with demanding "the same inalienable rights that men have"
> is
> > > that you forgot  to exercise the responsibilities
> >
> > I forgot nothing of the sort you stain of life.
> >
>
> I agree.  You forgot nothing.  How could you forget something if you never
> knew anything?
>
> >  that go with it, like
> > > comprehending the US Constitution, and the Second Amendment, and the
> rest of
> > > the Bill of Rights.
> >
> > Incorrect.
> >
>
> The segment of the American population who scored lower than if they had
> just guessed on a THIRD of TIMSS physics questions could not possibly be
> expected to comprehend the US Constitution.  It might have seemed
> straightforward to Mr. Jefferson et. al. when they wrote it, but little
did
> they know that feminazis would get to vote
> http://christianparty.net/timssphysics.htm
>
> > > Another problem is that women are now 11% more of the voters than men,
> yet
> > > as a group, they get back more directly from the IRS in tax credits
and
> > > "earned income credit" than they pay in taxes in the first place
> > > http://christianparty.net/menpy115.htm
> >
> > So do mostly male big business owners.
> >
>
> What a moron.  "mostly male big business owners" PAY $200 billion per year
> JUST in corporation taxes, and also they PAY more than 90% of federal
income
> taxes.
>
> But it's so easy to fool a feminazi just by printing a headline in the
> jewspaper about "corporate welfare".  Just WHERE do you feminazis "think"
> "corporate welfare" comes from?
>
> > > So women are now voting to spend money they never earned, whereas men
> are
> > > paying 115% of federal taxes and get outvoted on key issues by women.
> >
> > Yes, and big business has nothing to do with creating the volumous tax
> > shelters which force workers to pay for their bonus at CHRISTmas?
> >
>
> awwww.  If you worked for me, you wouldn't be working for me.  You'd be
> fired for THREE reasons:
>
> 1)  being an ingrate.
>
> 2)  being STUPID.
>
> 3)  being AMORAL.
>
> > > > Who cares?
> >
> > > And this is a great demonstration of exactly what's missing from the
> > > feminazi mentality.  If you were to attempt to set up your own little
> > > country, it would last about 35 seconds.  Because of your missing 3
1/2
> > > billion brain cells, you really are incapable of comprehending what's
> > > required to create and sustain a viable society, as men are.
> >
> > Wrong.
> >
>
> So where's that great feminazi empire that produced the world's highest
> standard of living, kinda like the one WE had BEFORE we used affirmative
> action to force companies to hire IDIOTS like you?
>
>
> >  You're so
> > > arrogant and self-centered that it's obvious that the 19th Amendment
was
> a
> > > HUGE mistake, one that adversely impacted women more than it did men,
> but
> > > which is way, way beyond your ability to understand.
> >
> > Nope. You are incorrect and women will continue to particpate as full
> > citizens in the USA.
>
> Women have never participated as full citizens, and never will. As a
group,
> you'll never even pay any taxes, much less your "equal share" of them.

Gee, I sure did, since the age of 15 when I had my first summer job.  Nobody
told me I didn't have to pay taxes because I'm female.

  As
> intellectuals, you've made a mockery of our once fine universities.

Show me some non-Manifesto statistics.  I, personally, was on the Honor
Roll.  I don't see that as making a mockery of the fine university I
attended.  My mother graduated Cumma sum Laude from the same university.

  As
> irresponsible and uninformed voters, you've turned all government
employment
> into the most massive welfare agency in human history.

Then you must include the men in this, since they still pretty much comprise
the majority of General Service workers.

Gee, I wonder how, for instance, your beloved President would like to know
he's the head of a "massive welfare agency".

  Even though three
> quarters of you KNOW that "gun control laws" are ineffective,
> unconstitutional, costly, and STUPID, you still demand even more, which is
> maybe the absolutely worst kind of citizen we could grow.

Not all of us, though I wager any one of us could dig up statistics showing
that those who mis-use a gun (whether through negiligence or crime) are
*overwhelmingly* male.

I, personally, own several pieces, and would be most upset if some
governmental agency decided to repeal my right to own them.

  The only reason
> the courts treat you like moral minors who can't uphold simple contracts,
is
> because you are.

Show me non-Manifesto statistics.  Women are treated just as equally as men
in the upholding of this nation's laws.  Women are also treated like adults,
when they are adults.  The only time this logic breaks down is when the
person ACTS like a moral minor - REGARDLESS of gender.

  And the biggest failures as wives and mothers in the
> history of the world is the American mother who,  in a mere half century
> (thanks to you feminazis), sank from the most admired, respected, and
> revered woman in the world to the laughing stock of nations, mainly by
> subjecting tens of millions of the nation's children to the vagaries of
> single-motherhood.

Because of those of YOUR gender who suddenly decided it was (a) alright to
beat women and children (damned cowards) or (b) decided that they could
abdicate their responsibilities to their families, or perhaps (c) because
they failed, overall, to live up to their end of the bargain, and left the
wife and children bereft, whether it be by virtue of death, or otherwise.

I know some pretty savvy single mothers who would definitely put YOU to
shame.  Just the thought of you raising a child singlehandedly gives me the
creeps.  Pre-programming a child with hatred IS a form of extreme mental and
emotional abuse, John Knight.

>
> You really couldn't have done a better job of destroying the American wife
> and mother if you'd tried.

Now you're blaming one individual for a situation that you no longer have
control over?  My, my.  Maybe instead of casting blame, look within
yourself.  Figure out why no woman worth her salt would have anything to do
with you.  When you realize the why of it, and truly change it (if you can),
then perhaps your blathering will cease.

The Shadow Dancer





More information about the Neur-sci mailing list

Send comments to us at biosci-help [At] net.bio.net