In article "Thalamus" <zhil at online.no> writes:
<
<"Jet" <thatjetnospam at yahoo.com> skrev i melding <news:3D364506.68C7F9B9 at yahoo.com...
<> >
{...}
<>
<> Ah, so you are a racist and a woman hater. Must really piss you off that
<> this BLACK WOMAN can do basic algebra and you can't.
<>
<> And now to basic physics:
<>
<> Give us the answer to the question you keep saying proves women are not
<> as smart as men, then explain it:
<>
<> http://christianparty.net/timssh04.htm
<>
<>
<> Get those extra brain cells cracking, OK?
<
<Nope, Niggeress.
Well, first off, Jet, allow me to apologize for this excresence
on the fundament of my own race. He's the idiot cousin we keep
locked in the attic.
Formalities aside, I have to wonder just exactly what:
< Here's the crime-stats and other data about your inferior race.
all that has to do with her criticism of John's "findings"
in regard to the male-female debate that the rest of us
(pay attention now, eh?) are actually engaged in. I don't
suppose it could be that you're ill-equipped to debate
her face to face, so you resort to screaming magic hate-words
in the hope that no one will notice you're changing the subject?
Man, I bet you were the king of badinage on the junior high playground.
< Maybe John is a misogyn,
Maybe Don Corleone was a bit shady,
<but I doubt he's a racist.
Well, you're right there. John isn't a "racist", he's a pan-racist.
The polymath of racists. A universal racist. An equal opportunity
racist.
<Stupid inferior Nigger, you're the laughing-stock of the world, Mugabe is
<setting the standard of behavior for your kind.
<
Says a proud member of a (my own) race, who slaughtered a hundred
million of one another, give or take, in the wars of the last
century.
But that's totally different, right Brian?
-- cary, ashamed