John Knight wrote:
>> "Shadow Dancer" <insomniac at winterslight.org> wrote in message
> news:ah46lo$qcu45$1 at ID-150265.news.dfncis.de...> >
> > "John Knight" <johnknight at usa.com> wrote in message
> > news:vC8Z8.2521$Fq6.167706 at news2.west.cox.net...> > >
> > > "Shadow Dancer" <insomniac at winterslight.org> wrote in message
> news:ah2vd9>
> > > > Parse...if you have looked at John Knight's website at all, the man is
> > not
> > > > only a misogynist, but carries a hefty dose of anti-semitism, and
> likely
> > > > thinks blacks are related more closer to monkeys than anglo men are.
> > > >
> > > > The more John Knight posts, the more it becomes clear that he is the
> > type
> > > of
> > > > man who sees no problem in the murder of, say, abortion clinic
> > employees,
> > > > because, after all, abortion is an "abomination of God" and it's his
> > civic
> > > > duty to behave as God's lefthand man (assuming Jesus still occupies
> the
> > > > mythological right seat).
> > > >
> > > > I also wager he is a hardcore Southern Baptist of the kind that looks
> > > > askance at people like us (pagan), then gets a shovel, a few buddies,
> > some
> > > > rope, nails, and two long boards. Have any idea what they do with
> this
> > > > stuff? Well, first they take the boards and nail them into a cross
> > shape.
> > > > Then they nail or rope their "intended victim" to this cross, then
> they
> > > bury
> > > > the entire thing. See, extremists like this believe in Free Speech
> only
> > > > insofar as it permits them to freely spread their particular brand of
> > > > hatred.
> > > >
> > > > Yes, I know of someone who was subjected to this very treatment and
> > > managed
> > > > to survive. He bears the nail scars to this day.
> > > >
> > > > I contend that each and every one of us who have disagreed strongly
> with
> > > > John Knight now have a metaphorical bullseye between our eyes, and if
> he
> > > > could find a way to get away with it, he'd use the bullseye to
> scramble
> > > our
> > > > billions of brain cells until our autonomic functions ceased to work
> > > (ergo,
> > > > we'd die).
> > > > ===
> > > > John Knight, I'm certain you are reading this. I do not know if it
> was
> > > your
> > > > own mother you had a severe problem with - or an ex-wife who suddenly
> > got
> > > a
> > > > clue and booked when she realized you really DON'T have any right to
> > tell
> > > > her how to live her life.
> > > >
> > > > Either way, a growing population of us would be very relieved if you
> > would
> > > > cease using the general Internet to display your psychological and
> > > > pathological urges, and saw a qualified psychiatrist instead.
> > > >
> > > > The Shadow Dancer
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > You feminazis have already proven the point of this thread a hundred
> times
> > > over, "Shadow Dancer", which is your abject inability to reason, think,
> > > analyze, or otherwise produce a cogent thought, so why do you keep on
> > trying
> > > to prove to everyone that you can't write one single honest and accurate
> > > sentence?
> >
> > Why is it that you cannot find evidence to support your claims other than
> on
> > your own, poorly-designed website? I'm still waiting for those references
> > that aren't cobbled together and posted to your site.
> > >
> > > You *almost* wrote one complete, accurate sentence, but then blew it
> right
> > > at the tail end with your feminazi gibberish.
> >
> > I wrote many more; it is sad that you resort to petty insults. You must
> > have an amazingly low level of self-esteem that you have to resort to
> > putting down someone by virtue of their gender, to feel better about
> > yourself.
> >
> > >
> > > This is proof that you cannot reason. Your childish blathering is so
> far
> > > off the mark that it obscures your other *almost* accurate sentences.
> > >
> > > And you expect the world to believe that men with 3 1/2 billion more
> brain
> > > cells than women have an "IQ" "equal" to women?
> > >
> > > You really have a low regard for men, don't you?
> >
> > I have high regard for anyone, regardless of gender, who is reasonable,
> > open-minded, and always willing to learn something new. I have an
> extremely
> > low regard for people like you, who have such miserable lives that they
> > resort to putting down others in order to falsely lift themselves up.
> >
> > I wager you have no idea what half the words I employ, mean - and why?
> > Because your OWN level of education is SO low that you cannot even so much
> > as figure out meanings by simple context. You see, I'm the one whose
> > intelligence scores off the chart - the SAME chart which is used,
> regardless
> > of gender. I'm the one with a college education. I'm the one who could
> > dance word-circles around you till the proverbial cows came home.
> >
> > That is why you refuse to reply to my reasonable requests for information
> > outside your website. Not only do legitimate studies often prove you
> wrong,
> > but you likely couldn't understand the language used if it was explained
> to
> > you in excruciating detail.
> >
> > Here, let me help you out - here is a link to Merriam Webster:
> >
> > http://www.merriam-webster.com> >
> > Perhaps you could begin working on your own level of education before
> > blatantly attacking anyone else's.
> >
> > The one post I noticed you ignored (but nobody else did) was the one
> > concerning how much of the brain the average person employs, regardless of
> > gender - a mere 8-10% according to most studies I've read.
> >
> > That means, John Knight, that it matters not how *many* brain cells you
> > have - it matters more *how* they are used.
> >
> > It would be far more productive if you would cease blathering hateful
> > nonsense, and spent the time on stretching your own use of your brain past
> > its paltry 8%.
> >
> > The Shadow Dancer
> >
> >
> >
>> aw, poor wittle baby. It was you who launched into the ad hominems, and
> when you got the same thing in kind, you cried, cried, cried.
>> If you do it again, you'll get the same thing back.
>> In the event you're prepared to get back to the subject at hand, why don't
> you critique the following statement:
>> "I'm female, and I was a numerical mathematics major in college. My IQ
> tested off the scale. So much for your theories" about the correlation
> between brain size and GRE scores for millions of test takers.
>> What do you think of this statement? Do you see the flaw? Is there
> anything contradictory about it?
>http://christianparty.net/grebrainsize.htm>> John Knight
Ah, so you are a racist and a woman hater. Must really piss you off that
this BLACK WOMAN can do basic algebra and you can't.
And now to basic physics:
Give us the answer to the question you keep saying proves women are not
as smart as men, then explain it:
http://christianparty.net/timssh04.htm
Get those extra brain cells cracking, OK?
J
