John Knight <johnknight at usa.com> wrote in message news:g%lZ8.5374$Fq6.294240 at news2.west.cox.net...
>> "Parse Tree" <parsetree at hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:u8YY8.2033$o7.790679 at news20.bellglobal.com...> > "Thalamus" <zhil at online.no> wrote in message
> > news:f2YY8.6064$HR.84289 at news4.ulv.nextra.no...> > > "Hope Munro Smith" <hopems at mail.utexas.edu> skrev i melding
> > > news:hopems-1507022000430001 at cs6625171-151.austin.rr.com...> > > > > He is right that it taints them, how can we be sure that they didn't
> > get
> > > the
> > > > > awards as a freebie ?
> > > > > It is logical and maybe brutally honest, but I guess that we're not
> > > > > subjucated to our emotions like the feminists.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > The Nobel Prize does not get handed out as a "freebie".
> > >
> > > He proved that on one occation, while you can't prove anything.
> > > Which one is more believeable, you or him ?
> > > I would not bet on you.
> >
> > No, he didn't.
> >
> >
>>> Marie's name was added to Pierre's half of the Nobel Prize AFTER the Nobel
> committee had selected other scientists, solely because a joint award is
> "more satisfying from the artistic point of view".
>> That doesn't sound like a freebie to you?
>> Did you know what Marie Sklodowska (aka Curie)
> accomplished? She put the French nuclear energy program
> 1-2 decades behind the rest of the world which "marked
> the end of the Anglo-Saxon monopoly".
>http://christianparty.net/curie.htm
Oh? How did she accomplish that?
> Does that sound like feminazi progress to you?
>> Is that what you want for this country?
>> John Knight
>>>
