"Parse Tree" <parsetree at hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:u8YY8.2033$o7.790679 at news20.bellglobal.com...
> "Thalamus" <zhil at online.no> wrote in message
> news:f2YY8.6064$HR.84289 at news4.ulv.nextra.no...> > "Hope Munro Smith" <hopems at mail.utexas.edu> skrev i melding
> > news:hopems-1507022000430001 at cs6625171-151.austin.rr.com...> > > > He is right that it taints them, how can we be sure that they didn't
> get
> > the
> > > > awards as a freebie ?
> > > > It is logical and maybe brutally honest, but I guess that we're not
> > > > subjucated to our emotions like the feminists.
> > > >
> > >
> > > The Nobel Prize does not get handed out as a "freebie".
> >
> > He proved that on one occation, while you can't prove anything.
> > Which one is more believeable, you or him ?
> > I would not bet on you.
>> No, he didn't.
>>
Marie's name was added to Pierre's half of the Nobel Prize AFTER the Nobel
committee had selected other scientists, solely because a joint award is
"more satisfying from the artistic point of view".
That doesn't sound like a freebie to you?
Did you know what Marie Sklodowska (aka Curie) accomplished? She put the
French nuclear energy program 1-2 decades behind the rest of the world which
"marked the end of the Anglo-Saxon monopoly".
http://christianparty.net/curie.htm
Does that sound like feminazi progress to you?
Is that what you want for this country?
John Knight
