i've founf what i 'dropped-out' to loof-for.
Kenneth Collins wrote in message ...
>i'm going to work off-line for a while.
>>i RETRACT my earlier statment with respect to having communicated "10%" of
>the work i've done.
>>i've not yet communicated 1%.
I'd presumed' that more of what's in what i've discussed, but which wasn't
addressed explicitly, had communicated than is actually the case.
>>anyway, there was an important article in today's _New York Times_,
"Science
>Times" section: "Beyond Temporary 'Miracles"', by ABAGAIL KUGER, M. D.,
pD6.
>>the problem discussed, AIDS coc[k]tail side-effects, occurs as a function
of
>immune system function being a form of 'cognition', and "functional
>multiplexing" [AoK, Ap9].
>>i'm wanting to explore the problem inherent in the non-external-correlation
>of "functional multiplexing" [and i've also got to redouble my efforts at
>finding a way to pay the bills]. so i'll be working offline for a while.
since immune system function is a form of 'cognition', it's possible to
'teach' it, and, via regimines which follow curved-paths, direct it to fix
stuff that it'd not, otherwise, be able to reach.
and, so, the 'functional-multiplexing' problem is not 'Impossible'.
problem-solutions with respect to it 'just' have to follow curved paths.
precisely-staged medication, in which the overall Thermodynamic is
maintained, while, at each 'stage', what's left of the problem Thermodynamic
is minimized.
get it?
the approach to Hard Problems, like AIDS, will not happen via a design-it
and administer-it-all-at-once approach.
the approach that can work will have to 'morph' with respect to
immune-system 'cognition'; with respect to the Thermodynamics inherent, and
while adjusting to maintain the overall Thermodynamic [Life], simultaneously
adjust to ever-minimize the anti-Life Thermodynamic.
get it?
the functional multiplexing problem can be addressed through convergence
upon Thermodynamic 'offsets' that take advantage of the
window-of-opportunity that's inherent in the 'time'-course of immune-system
'learning'. between 'naivete' and full-manifestation of this or that
immune-system response, things are in flux.
in order to address the problem of functional multiplexing, treatments have
to be adjusted within that 'time' frame.
it's like using tweezers vs. using pliers.
treatments will converge upon correlated sequences, each including all the
necessary Life-preserving Thermodynamic offsets, while including the
anti-disease offsets, all correlated to 'momentary' immune-system 'state'.
at first [always?] it'll have to be done in-Hospital only.
new machines'll have to be developed to do the analysis, dosage
combinatorials, and delivery, in real-'time'. [so it's not a
snap-your-fingers thing, but as the technology progresses, it'll become
ever-more strong.
a significant side-benefit will be that the apparatus will be able to
automatically construct an immune-system database, which, as it grows, will,
itself, constitute a rich field of investigation.
anyway, this is the stuff that i broke-off to seek.
i understand that it's probably not 'decipherable' to others, but i'm
putting it here in the hope that it is.
k. p. collins
>[...]
