"John Knight" <johnknight at usa.com> wrote in message
news:cO4Z8.1065$Fq6.83594 at news2.west.cox.net...
>> Which leads to the biggest problem with your response, which is that we're
> discussing averages, and you're discussing individuals. Even IF "there
are
> always those rare individuals who are the exceptions to the rule", that
> doesn't affect the averages AT ALL.
The fact that many females test above many males indicates that the money
invested in their education was well placed.
You state that women are useless, which is clearly not true.
