"Jen Larson" <straycat at udel.edu> wrote in message
news:3D34643B.3F30553 at udel.edu...
>>> John Knight wrote:
>> > You did help to illustrate the point of this thread, though, which is
that
> > you really can't name a recent notable woman intellectual (unless you
> > subscribe to the theory that Betty Friedan is an intellectual).
>> YAWN! You are such a .ucked [bleep] up SCUMBAG!
>> Here's a few (thousands more available)
>> Nancy Faigen
> President and CEO
> Voxeo
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Laura Greene
> Swanlund Professor of Physics
>> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Dr. Claudine Simson
> Vice-President
> Global External Research and
> Intellectual Property
> Nortel Networks
>>> Face it you sexist piece of shi. [bleep], having a .ussy [bleep] or not
does not dictate
> your intellectual genius.
You forgot one!
Carly Fiorina!
President of HP.
Why would you leave her out?
John Knight
ps--oops, did I forget to mention that, since the day Carly made that
brilliant decision to replace Easter with Martin Luther Coon Day, that the
value of HP stock plunged 75%.
http://christianparty.net/hp.htm
oops, make that 80%--it just dropped another 4.93% today.
http://money.excite.com/jsp/ct/bigchart.jsp
pps--since we're discussing "IQ" and brain size, Jen, and since the comment
was about "women intellectuals" [a true oxymoron, if there ever was one]
would it be too much to ask if you have anything else to say about them
(like, what their IQ or brain size is that you think they're notable, or how
you believe they qualify as "women intellectuals")?
