guess i should explain.
it's impractical to reiterate stuff that's been reiterated 'ad infinitum' in
the past.
i expect that at least some of the correlated discussions are archived on
the net, and encourage folks to give them a look.
hopefully, in the future, there'll be a 'compilation' opportunity.
the need is to move-on in the work, rather than entering 'endless-loops' of
reiteration.
before i 'lose my ability to adapt' :-)
k. p. collins
Kenneth Collins wrote in message ...
>i stand on what i posted.
>>k. p. collins
