IUBio

brain sizes: Einstein's and women's

Shadow Dancer insomniac at winterslight.org
Tue Jul 16 15:53:36 EST 2002


"John Knight" <johnknight at usa.com> wrote in message
news:Ju_Y8.67589$P%6.4560082 at news2.west.cox.net...
>
> Feminazis insist that there is no advantage to men for their 18% larger
> brain size which accommodates 3 1/2 billion more brain cells than women's
> brains, and that men and women are of "equal IQ" because the smaller brain
> size of women is compensated for by superior construction or better
> materials in the smaller female brain.  Furthermore, the smaller female
> brain is actually so much better and faster than the male brain that women
> are more intelligent than men. The 24 to 43% higher GRE Quantitative
scores
> of men across all races (which is duplicated in every other standardized
> test ever developed) has nothing to do with the additional 3 1/2 billion
> brain cells in the male brain, but is due solely to "centuries of
> discrimination against" women by men rather than the known physical
> differences between the brains of men and women.  This "centuries of
> discrimination against" women affected only the ability of women to
reason,
> but had nothing to do with providing the female brain with 3 1/2 billion
> fewer brain cells, because only men are responsible for those lower test
> scores of women. Besides, it's ridiculous to believe that this
technological
> society is even capable of measuring the size of the female brain
accurately
> enough to arrive at such a sexist conclusion. Anyone who would dare to
> disagree with this position does so solely because they are a misogynist.
> Not only is any discussion of the correlation between brain size and GRE
> Quantitative scores taboo, but those who dare to challenge this feminist
> principle of superior female intellectuality are a danger to society and
> should be killed.
>
> This is not a joke.  This is the collective intelligence of feminazism
> exhibited on the internet.  These are the exact words used by many
> feminazis, and agreed to by 100% of all the feminazis who responded.  Not
> one single feminazi ever challenged one single word of their own
ideologues'
> ridiculous statements, and numerous pathetically feminized men agreed with
> them.
>
> Reality is quite a different thing.  There was never a time when the male
> and female brain were the same size or when male and female intellect were
> "equal".  The female brain didn't evolve to its current inferior state
> because men "discriminated against" women for even a day, much less for
> centuries.  The brain is not like a muscle which can be made larger
through
> exercise, and there isn't a shred of evidence that average brain size by
> race and sex changed by even one cubic centimeter from Day One (unless you
> want to accept the ludicrous notion that Neanderthal Man and homo sapiens
> had a "common ancestor", a theory debunked with recent DNA studies).  IF
> [note big "if"] such feminazi theories have had any effect on society,
they
> have been an agent in the dumbing down of America as illustrated by the 98
> point drop in SAT scores over the last four decades.  Any perceived
> "narrowing of the gender gap" was accomplished only by dumbing down boys
> faster than we dumbed down girls, but never by an improvement in the
overall
> intellect of women.
>
> Discriminating against boys will not improve the intellectual state of
> girls.  Systemic discrimination against males wherein they are reduced to
> only 35% of GRE test takers, while women are increased to 65%, not only
> failed to increase female brain size or improve female intellect--the FEW
> men who did participate still occupied 92% of the upper tenth percentile
of
> GRE scores.  Not only are there twice as many American women than American
> men taking the GRE, but there were so few American men that they were even
> outnumbered by foreign students.  Yet the insatiable feminazis still
whined
> about "discrimination against girls".
>
> Even when feminazis reduce the percentage of American boys to 1%, and
> increase foreign students to 90%, they will still be whining about
> "centuries of discrimination against", because their ephemeral goal of
> achieving a female intellectual capacity "equal" to men is a false flag.
>
> What could be worse for American women, as well as for society as a whole,
> than to raise false expectations that have been known to be physically
> impossible since the beginning of man?

What could be worse is allowing you and your kind to spread your brand of
hatred without facing the shouting voices of thousands, John Knight.

You also forget that average men and women *both* use roughly 10% of their
entire brain capacity.

I can see, without studies and without proof, that you are stuck in that 10%
which was more or less alloted to you in birth, John Knight.  Obviously
women (and men of reason, which you and your followers are obviously not)
have found ways to extend past the paltry 10% and utilize more of the brain,
excess cells notwithstanding.

Countless medical studies have more than abundantly rebuked your skewed
statistics to show an average man's excess braincells are used for motor
functions of larger areas of muscle.  Hell, I'm six feet tall - and if I am
taller than you, then chances are excellent I possess a few thousand more
braincells than you do.

The amount of braincells isn't as important as how they are used and IF
(notice the big IF) they are used.

John Knight, it must be miserable to confine yourself to your mere 8-10%.
I, however, waste no pity upon you, because you and you alone have confined
yourself.

The Shadow Dancer





More information about the Neur-sci mailing list

Send comments to us at biosci-help [At] net.bio.net