"Angilion" <angilion at yinyang.enterprise-plc.com> wrote in message
news:3338c0b2.0207141547.5bf1fd38 at posting.google.com...
> On Sat, 13 Jul 2002 20:25:52 GMT, angilion at ypical.fsnet.co.uk (Angilion)
wrote:
>> >On Fri, 12 Jul 2002 23:08:17 -0500, "Shadow Dancer"
> ><insomniac at winterslight.org> wrote:
>> [..]
>> >>(1) A woman's pain threshhold is far higher, due to the ability to bear
> >>children; roughly 5 minutes of labor pain would literally kill a man.
> >
> >If it wasn't so sad, it would be amusing to see these two extreme
> >sexists babbling crap to "prove" their sexism is reasonable.
> >
> >I know for a fact that you cannot provide any evidence to support
> >your statement, above, or any part of it. You are just burbling
> >the prevailing sexism.
> >
> >If anyone wishes to look for themselves, just do a search
> >for "pain threshold +men +women" at, for example, www.google.com
> >
> >You will find numerous studies, some of which conclude that
> >women have a higher pain threshold than men and some of
> >which conclude the reverse. None of them come anywhere
> >near supporting the ridiculous statement made by Shadow Dancer.
>> It's a little rude to reply to oneself, but I would like to point out that
> I am wrong. Having checked many of the links, it is clear that
> the evidence indicates that, on average, men have a higher
> pain threshold than women. The one study I saw with the opposite
> result appreared to have been extrapolated from research on
> pregnant rats, which says volumes about its relevance.
>> [..]
That's one that may need to be added to http://christianparty.net/sex.htm
Angilion.
Could you provide the url for that reference?
Thx,
John Knight
