"Hope Munro Smith" <hopems at mail.utexas.edu> wrote in message
news:hopems-1507020805190001 at cs6625171-151.austin.rr.com...
> > >
> > > Eh what? I must be misunderstanding my own posts
> > > because I don't understand how I was countering with
> > > more sexism. Please quote the text you are talking
> > > about. I did say Knight has a sexist
> >
> > You're suggesting that the verbal scores are not included because they
> > would interfere with his agenda, but you're forgetting that such a
> > statement smacks of sexism in itself.
>> It wasn't intended that way. What I was saying is that
> his results would magically disappear because things
> would even out. Not because women are better.
> >
> > > agenda, but that is quite obvious to anyone looking
> > > at his site (IF it loads). How is pointing this
> > > out sexist? By the way, did I also mention that he's
> > > quite obviously racist and anti-semitic too?
> >
> > Don't know about that.
If you know of ANY test which is missing from this site which shows that
women have an intellectual advantage in ANY arena, it will most definitely
be linked to the FRONT PAGE at http://christianparty.net/ for all to see,
and you will win a lobster dinner and a dewey button!
John Knight
ps--For verbal scores, where feminazis claim that women have an advantage,
see http://christianparty.net/sat.htm where men outperform women in SAT
Verbal by 13 points, and http://christianparty.net/gre19981999.jpg where men
outperform women in GRE Verbal by 25 points.
And if you believe this year was a fluke, see
http://christianparty.net/gre19961997.jpg where it was 27 points, and
http://christianparty.net/gre19971998.jpg where it was 24 points.
And if you believe it's not true for one of the races, then take a look at
the differences for 7 races listed there.
It's been true year to year, race to race, for a LONG time, so this feminazi
LIE must be put to rest.
