IUBio

brain sizes: Einstein's and women's

John Knight johnknight at usa.com
Sat Jul 13 01:47:18 EST 2002


"Mark D. Morin" <mdmpsyd at PETERHOOD69gwi.net> wrote in message
> > "When Wechsler was developing his IQ test, he found that out of 105
tests
> > assessing skills in solving maze-puzzles, involving the most
heterogeneous
> > populations throughout the world, 99 showed an incontrovertible male
> > superiority. (Wechsler resolved this type of problem by eliminating all
> > those tests that resulted in findings of significant sex differences.)"
> > Leonardo_member at newsguy.com in 9miftl0239r at drn.newsguy.com
> >
> > They throw out 94% of the test,
>
> What test?  It wasn't constructed yet.
>
> then proclaim "the sexes are equal".
> >
> > But GRE enables us to put those questions BACK on the table,
>
> strange, none of the published research, available at
> http://www.gre.org/respredict.html support that hypothesis.
>

Let's face the facts:  "education" in this country is not the honorable
profession it is in many other countries.  For one thing, our "teachers" are
the lowest scoring students in the crop.  Education majors score 88 points
lower than Social Science Majors on SAT Verbal and 161 points lower than
Physical Science majors in SAT Math.  Conversely, Japanese teachers come
from the other end of the scale http://christianparty.net/teachers.htm

How can our teachers possibly be expected to teach so many students who
comprehend the material far better than they do?  Japanese teachers don't
have that problem.

Our teachers are also not the moral examples they were a century ago.  They
willingly pass on the Wechsler LIE about boys' and girls' "IQ scores" being
"equal", so we can't give them any credit for being moral examples for our
children.

What should we expect from such a motley crowd when they read the
nonsensical disclaimer that GRE tests don't measure "intelligence"?  An
honest assessment?  Absolutely not.  An astute analysis?  Even less likely.

This disclaimer is a LIE.  It measures precisely what it claims that it
doesn't measure.  The quantitative portion of the test is what the "IQ test"
SHOULD be, but to prevent mind numbed teachers from understanding that, they
put this phony disclaimer on the test.

John Knight





More information about the Neur-sci mailing list

Send comments to us at biosci-help [At] net.bio.net