In article <SZCX8.47920$P%6.3357792 at news2.west.cox.net>
"John Knight" <johnknight at usa.com> writes:
<
<
<"Shadow Dancer" <insomniac at winterslight.org> wrote in message
<news:agm2br$mukqa$1 at ID-150265.news.dfncis.de...
<> Here are some I just dug up:
<>
{...}
<>
<> And yet another:
<> http://faculty.washington.edu/chudler/heshe.html
<>
<> My terminology was wrong, I meant the corpus callosum. Either way, women
<> use their entire brains more efficiently than men do and, once again, size
<> does NOT matter :P
<>
<>
<
<Not only was your terminology wrong, but so were your conclusions. Here are
<some I just dug up. In the following 12 subjects, no country scored lower
<than American 12th Grade Girls who scored:
What Johnny isn't telling you is that he "just" dug these up years ago,
and has been drawing erroneous conclusions ever since. For example
he also is not telling you that:
<
<Zero percent of American 12th grade girls correctly solved TIMSS math
<problems.
<
<Zero percent of American 12th grade girls correctly solved TIMSS physics
<problems.
<
that I have twice in the past demonstrated that his "method" of "analysis"
which "led" to the above "conclusions" would also "lead" to the "conclusions"
that:
a. anyone answering all questions correctly should receive a
mark of only 80%, and
b. five out of every four girls got one question wrong. Can
you say reduction ad absurdem?
It's not the girls who can't apply math correctly.
Google has it.
-- cary
