Chive doesn't have to.
If you know anything about the "wiring" of male versus female brains, then
you would know that women use their brains far more efficiently than men do.
The cerebral cortex of a man's brain behaves as though damaged, allowing
only the random signal to travel from one side to another. Other than that,
most neural firing is confined to either one side, or the other.
Women, however, have a f, lly-functioning cerebral cortex and neural firing
is nearly constant across this 'bridge', using the brain far more
efficiently.
Bwah.
"PETER BUONO" <PFBUONO at worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
news:fBqX8.94141$UT.6217925 at bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
> Devin's only golden opportunity are showers in that very color.
>> "x9k23Plg8dgmrxz83jfph0e35h" <x9k23Plg8dgmrxz83jfph0e35h at yahoo.com> wrote
in
> message news:ec4674b3.0207111433.88db9bf at posting.google.com...> > ...To prove that you can offer a pro-feminist, pro-equality argument
> > using FACTS and EVIDENCE, as you claim you do.
> >
> > Here on board we have John Knight, arch antifeminist and author of a
> > proposal to repeal the Nineteenth Amendment. In this thread, he's
> > arguing with facts and evidence that seems to support his claim that
> > women are intellectually inferior to men.
> >
> > So come on Chive, show us your salt, show us you're not merely some
> > annoying spammer trying to take control of an anarchical alt.group.
> > Let's see you put your money where your keyboard is and prove that you
> > _really_are_ concerned with feminism, facts, and evidence.
> >
> > "John Knight" <johnknight at usa.com> wrote in message
> news:<UUZW8.33126$P%6.2756978 at news2.west.cox.net>...
> > > "Mark D. Morin" <mdmpsyd at NOSPAMgwi.net> wrote in message
> > > news:3D2C11FA.5020603 at NOSPAMgwi.net...> > > > Bob LeChevalier wrote:
> > > > > "Mark D. Morin" <mdmpsyd at NOSPAMgwi.net> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >>What does all of this have to do with the assertion that there is
a
> > > > >>gender bias in IQ testing? Mattarazzo (1972 *Weschler's
Measurement
> and
> > > > >>Appraisal of Adult Intelligence*) reviewd the then current
> literature
> > > > >>quite extensively (p 352 ff). He cited numerous studies that
> attempted
> > > > >>to demonstrate such a difference and failed to do so.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > I think that his claim is that, since (if) Weschler intentionally
> > > omitted
> > > > > subtests
> > > >
> > > > Subtests did not exist before they were constructed.
> > > >
> > > > > that men did better on than women, that the bias for a false
> > > > > equality was built into the test from the beginning. If he indeed
> > > eliminated
> > > > > all subtests that show a gender difference, then of course you
will
> not
> > > find
> > > > > studies that demonstrate a difference.
> > > > >
> > > > > But then one is never entirely sure what the nincompoop (JK)
really
> > > thinks.
> > > >
> > > > seems like a great conspiracy theorist. I wonder if he believes in
> alien
> > > > abductions too. He really should take a course on psychometrics and
> > > > test construction before making the comments he does.
> > > >
> > >
> > > This of course is the very argument that Peter Zohrab predicted
> "liberals"
> > > would resort to when confronted with simple FACTS.
> > >
> > > If every test known to humankind DOES demonstrate a "systemic gender
> > > difference" [read: in English, the natural difference between the
> sexes],
> > > but so-called "IQ tests" do not, then it's not me who's suspect--it's
> > > Wechsler and his fellow "scientists" who evidently manipulated the
data
> > > right from the start, and all "educators" and politicians who followed
> right
> > > along like little lemmings.
> > >
> > > John Knight
>>
