Devin's only golden opportunity are showers in that very color.
"x9k23Plg8dgmrxz83jfph0e35h" <x9k23Plg8dgmrxz83jfph0e35h at yahoo.com> wrote in
message news:ec4674b3.0207111433.88db9bf at posting.google.com...
> ...To prove that you can offer a pro-feminist, pro-equality argument
> using FACTS and EVIDENCE, as you claim you do.
>> Here on board we have John Knight, arch antifeminist and author of a
> proposal to repeal the Nineteenth Amendment. In this thread, he's
> arguing with facts and evidence that seems to support his claim that
> women are intellectually inferior to men.
>> So come on Chive, show us your salt, show us you're not merely some
> annoying spammer trying to take control of an anarchical alt.group.
> Let's see you put your money where your keyboard is and prove that you
> _really_are_ concerned with feminism, facts, and evidence.
>> "John Knight" <johnknight at usa.com> wrote in message
news:<UUZW8.33126$P%6.2756978 at news2.west.cox.net>...
> > "Mark D. Morin" <mdmpsyd at NOSPAMgwi.net> wrote in message
> > news:3D2C11FA.5020603 at NOSPAMgwi.net...> > > Bob LeChevalier wrote:
> > > > "Mark D. Morin" <mdmpsyd at NOSPAMgwi.net> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >>What does all of this have to do with the assertion that there is a
> > > >>gender bias in IQ testing? Mattarazzo (1972 *Weschler's Measurement
and
> > > >>Appraisal of Adult Intelligence*) reviewd the then current
literature
> > > >>quite extensively (p 352 ff). He cited numerous studies that
attempted
> > > >>to demonstrate such a difference and failed to do so.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I think that his claim is that, since (if) Weschler intentionally
> > omitted
> > > > subtests
> > >
> > > Subtests did not exist before they were constructed.
> > >
> > > > that men did better on than women, that the bias for a false
> > > > equality was built into the test from the beginning. If he indeed
> > eliminated
> > > > all subtests that show a gender difference, then of course you will
not
> > find
> > > > studies that demonstrate a difference.
> > > >
> > > > But then one is never entirely sure what the nincompoop (JK) really
> > thinks.
> > >
> > > seems like a great conspiracy theorist. I wonder if he believes in
alien
> > > abductions too. He really should take a course on psychometrics and
> > > test construction before making the comments he does.
> > >
> >
> > This of course is the very argument that Peter Zohrab predicted
"liberals"
> > would resort to when confronted with simple FACTS.
> >
> > If every test known to humankind DOES demonstrate a "systemic gender
> > difference" [read: in English, the natural difference between the
sexes],
> > but so-called "IQ tests" do not, then it's not me who's suspect--it's
> > Wechsler and his fellow "scientists" who evidently manipulated the data
> > right from the start, and all "educators" and politicians who followed
right
> > along like little lemmings.
> >
> > John Knight
