"John Knight" <johnknight at usa.com> skrev i melding
news:5AjX8.44754$P%6.3094425 at news2.west.cox.net...
> "Thalamus" <zhil at online.no> wrote in message
> news:KdfX8.4466$HR.62122 at news4.ulv.nextra.no...> >
> > > before reading the page to which your post directed me, i'd only read
> > rather
> > > sketchy reports on "Einstein's brain". my understanding was that it
was
> > cut
> > > up, fixed, and sat in a jar, almost lost, for decades, with only
> > > long-post-mortem investigation. the thing that i found
most-interesting
> is
> > > that Einstein's brain was found to have significantly-mor neuralglia
> > cells.
> >
> > Which is strange - glial cells are NOT information-processing cells,
> they're
> > functionally support cells IE oligodendrocytes, Schwann cells etc.
> > So how could Einstein be a genious, if his structural neural network
> wasn't
> > exceptional, if his brainsize were 'normal' ????
> >
> > Brian
>> The short answer is that his only "genius" was in being able to plagiarize
> the works of the real geniuses, coupled with the "American" media's
> complicity in covering up his shortcomings, like his flunking algebra,
> failing to be admitted to college, never having a lab to do the research
he
> claims he did, and a few other "small" details like that
>http://christianparty.net/einstein.htm>> John Knight
Yes, I've read that the theory was finished 5 years before he 'discovered'
it thorugh a 'dream'.
Brian
