John Knight wrote:
> "Mark D. Morin" <mdmpsyd at NOSPAMgwi.net> wrote in message
> news:3D2BA0AB.8080603 at NOSPAMgwi.net...>>>John Knight wrote:
>>>>>"Mark D. Morin" <mdmpsyd at NOSPAMgwi.net> wrote in message
>>>news:3D2AB9D5.4090207 at NOSPAMgwi.net...>>>>>>>>>>Tom Breton wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>"Mark D. Morin" <mdmpsyd at PETERHOOD69gwi.net> writes:
>>>>>>>>>>How? Point me to one peer reviewed article that makes this challenge.
>>>>>>Are you even familiar enough with the tests to make this idiotic
>>>>>>statement? What specific items are biased?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Now, be fair. You know there are severe political and ideological
>>>>>pressures against publishing anything like that.
>>>>>>>>No, I don't know that.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>hmmm, even the left wing "news" is full of reports of such bias, so it
>>>shouldn't take long for you to locate it if you look. If you can't find
>>> it,
>>>>let me know and I'll give you a ton of leads.
>>>>The leads you've already provided don't appear particularly sound.
>>>>When I say "no," I mean I've seen the studies published. Ergo, there
>>can't be that great of a prohibition.
>>>>> Not quite sure what you meant here,
what i mean is that you assert a conspiracy to keep research from being
published. it gets published, where's the conspiracy?
> but let's put this a different way. Two
> thirds of those students who score over 550 in SAT Math are boys, but girls
> are two thirds of college admissions now.
>> Do you really think there's no bias involved here?
is there any claim that those admissions are being based on GRE, SAT, or
IQ scores?
--
====================================================
You can't make someone love you, but you can let
yourself be loved by someone.
http://home.gwi.net/~mdmpsyd/index.htm
