John Knight wrote:
> "Mark D. Morin" <mdmpsyd at NOSPAMgwi.net> wrote in message
> news:3D2BA1AB.3090604 at NOSPAMgwi.net...
>>how is it that IQ scores continue to be a robust predictor of later
>>performance?
>>>>>>> Says who? Wechsler? And you trust statements like that from yoyos like
> him?
it would be rather hard for weschler to say that now. Try looking at the
published research.
>> If it's so "robust", then why's it incapable of detecting the difference in
> mental aptitude between men and women, when men historically, from the
> beginning of time, in every country on the Earth today, earn 42% more than
> women?
huh? there has to be an underlying IQ difference to justify sociological
prejudices? What rock have you been hiding under?
--
====================================================
You can't make someone love you, but you can let
yourself be loved by someone.
http://home.gwi.net/~mdmpsyd/index.htm