want a copy of the hypertext doc?
all your Qs are answered in it [and the refs. cited in AoK].
as for the way i write, it keeps me alive, so i do-it. [but there's also a
bit more than is immediately-apparent in-it.]
k. p. collins
mat wrote in message <43525ce3.0207050306.296bde03 at posting.google.com>...
>I realise that you take any kind of criticism of your posts as
>evidence of a government or other conspiracy against you revealing the
>true nature of reality and the self but I would like to know if you
>have any evidence at all for your ideas. You seem to broadly put
>every aspect of human behviour under the scope of "TD E/I
>minimization" without actually explaining what that is (properly
>explaining, your oft used definition does not actually make sense e.g.
>relative ratios (what other type is there?)). At the limit of
>minimizing excitation, surely there would be no activity at all? what
>happens then? how is "topologically distributed" any different from
>just "distributed"?
>>Furthermore, your affected writing style (hyphenating (e.g. be-cause,
>you are not the first to realise how some words are derived),
>capitalising mid-sentence and enclosing every other word in
>apostrophies) is rather grating, as is your melodramatic tone:- you
>may well recieve more replies if you wrote like everyone else.
