further comments below.
Kenneth Collins wrote in message ...
>Kenneth Collins wrote in message ...
>>Kenneth Collins wrote in message ...
>>>[...]
>>but physical reality isn't the 'Maths'.
>>boy, i =was= 'tired' :-)
>>what i was talking about has to do with the way that this or that Maths
>description seems, now or then, to 'coincide' with physical reality. but,
>when additional information is gathered, it's seen that some other Maths,
>'coincides' with physical reality.
>>example: Ptolemaic Earth-centered planetary view-->Copernican Sun-centered
>planetary view.
>>when one looks, one usually can discern a convergence within succeeding
>generations of Maths that 'coincide' with physical reality.
>>the 'point' that i was discussing in the prior msg is that this convergence
>in the Maths 'worldview' is heading right for WDB2T which is what
>evolutionary dynamics 'figured-out' eons ago, and constructed nervous
>systems around.
>>nervous systems do =all= Calculation relative to WDB2T [obtain 'values' in
>terms of relative coincidence with WDB2T]. all of the neural Topology is
>[ideally] minimally-aligned with WDB2T. to the degree that there're False
>Finitizatons in the mix, the neural Topology remains aligned with WDB2T,
but
>non-minimally. degree of alignment with WDB2T determines the
>information-processing 'power' of a nervous system.
>>non-minimal alignment with WDB2T is a TD E/I(up) condition, and requires
>more information-processing Work than is required in the minamally-aligned
>case, which lengthens problem-solving 'time'-courses, has less
'waggle-room'
>relative to the volitional diminishing-returns decision threshold [AoK,
>Ap7], more of the work done goes to waste.
>>can 'you' see, in the above, why it is that experience matters?
>>a nervous system can do X information-processing work, but, if a nervous
>system is relatively-misaligned with WDB2T, commensurately-more of that
>nervous system's work goes to waste.
>>WDB2T 'maps' Truth within physical reality.
>>this's why nervous systems are 'engineered' around WDB2T.
>>to the degree that it converges-upon such, interface-facilitation Maths
>coincides with physical reality.
look and see, this's exactly what's in numerical implementations of the
Calculus. when the 'slices' into which the problem-stuff is divided are
relatively-large, the technique yields commensurately-inaccurate results.
there's 'waste' in-there. but as the 'slices' of the problem-stuff become
smaller and smaller, the 'waste' becomes commensurately-smaller, and the
solution approaches exactness more and more.
this's 'just' a 'climbing' of the WDB2T gradient toward 'zero-waste'; toward
exactness.
it's be-cause of this 'co-incidence' with WDB2T that the Calculus works so
well with respect to physical reality. [of course, "garbage in, garbage out"
applies. the data that're operated-upon within the Calculus must, itself,
accurately reflect physical reality. this's the 'point' at which traditional
applications of the Calculus have broken-down... erroneous assumptions force
the data to diverge from WDB2T, so the Calculus cannot co-incide with WDB2T,
and yield, commensurately-inaccurate 'results'.
>>to the degree that it diverges from such, relative to physical reality, the
>interface-facilitation Maths is 'just' an arbitrary descriptive 'language'
>that has usefulness to the degree that both the 'language' and its
>correlated experience are simultaneously shared'.
>>Big-Difference.
>>Maths applied to physical reality can be Verified through its coincidence
>with WDB2T.
and mis-takes in 'organizing' data operated-upon via this or that Maths can
be Recognized in their correlated divergence from WDB2T.
which is what Information Calculus [AoK, Ap6] does [or, at least, =can= do.
whether or not it does depends upon the scope of the data operated upon
within the Information Calculus technique. [i. e., artificially-delimited
data [from within artificially-'narrow' 'boundaries'] yield divergent
'solutions.], which is what's discussed in AoK, Ap7. raising the "volitional
diminishing-returns decision" threshold corresponds to a 'broadening' of the
data that're operated-upon via Information Calculus. [all of AoK can be read
as a strictly-Maths paper [in a way analogous to this example]].
k. p. collins
>>this's Tapered Harmony's position 'in a nutshell'.
>>this's =all= of Science.
>>using the WDB2T approach requires 'back-tracking' within 'traditional'
>approaches to physical reality, fixing Errors, and rewriting, but, then,
>allows progress that was, formerly. 'Impossible'.
>>does this make things clearer [easier to comprehend]?
>>if not, why not try to 'break' these few simple 'rules' by trying to state
>any 'contradiction' from within all of physical reality?
>>Formal-Challenge.
>>k. p. collins
>>
