Kenneth Collins wrote in message ...
>Kenneth Collins wrote in message ...
>>[...]
>but physical reality isn't the 'Maths'.
boy, i =was= 'tired' :-)
what i was talking about has to do with the way that this or that Maths
description seems, now or then, to 'coincide' with physical reality. but,
when additional information is gathered, it's seen that some other Maths,
'coincides' with physical reality.
example: Ptolemaic Earth-centered planetary view-->Copernican Sun-centered
planetary view.
when one looks, one usually can discern a convergence within succeeding
generations of Maths that 'coincide' with physical reality.
the 'point' that i was discussing in the prior msg is that this convergence
in the Maths 'worldview' is heading right for WDB2T which is what
evolutionary dynamics 'figured-out' eons ago, and constructed nervous
systems around.
nervous systems do =all= Calculation relative to WDB2T [obtain 'values' in
terms of relative coincidence with WDB2T]. all of the neural Topology is
[ideally] minimally-aligned with WDB2T. to the degree that there're False
Finitizatons in the mix, the neural Topology remains aligned with WDB2T, but
non-minimally. degree of alignment with WDB2T determines the
information-processing 'power' of a nervous system.
non-minimal alignment with WDB2T is a TD E/I(up) condition, and requires
more information-processing Work than is required in the minamally-aligned
case, which lengthens problem-solving 'time'-courses, has less 'waggle-room'
relative to the volitional diminishing-returns decision threshold [AoK,
Ap7], more of the work done goes to waste.
can 'you' see, in the above, why it is that experience matters?
a nervous system can do X information-processing work, but, if a nervous
system is relatively-misaligned with WDB2T, commensurately-more of that
nervous system's work goes to waste.
WDB2T 'maps' Truth within physical reality.
this's why nervous systems are 'engineered' around WDB2T.
to the degree that it converges-upon such, interface-facilitation Maths
coincides with physical reality.
to the degree that it diverges from such, relative to physical reality, the
interface-facilitation Maths is 'just' an arbitrary descriptive 'language'
that has usefulness to the degree that both the 'language' and its
correlated experience are simultaneously shared'.
Big-Difference.
Maths applied to physical reality can be Verified through its coincidence
with WDB2T.
this's Tapered Harmony's position 'in a nutshell'.
this's =all= of Science.
using the WDB2T approach requires 'back-tracking' within 'traditional'
approaches to physical reality, fixing Errors, and rewriting, but, then,
allows progress that was, formerly. 'Impossible'.
does this make things clearer [easier to comprehend]?
if not, why not try to 'break' these few simple 'rules' by trying to state
any 'contradiction' from within all of physical reality?
Formal-Challenge.
k. p. collins
