IUBio

You Must Remember This

Liar42 liar42 at aol.com
Sun Oct 21 04:47:58 EST 2001


>OTOH, the best theory we have, that storage is a product of the
plasticity inherent in changes to cell interconnections, synaptic
density, receptor types/placement/densities, etc, seems to be consistent with
what occurs in practice. Moreover, we know these changes do occur.<

If that's you best theory I find it rather poor, as it does not discern
different systems, and generalizes around as if there were zero differences
between systems concerning long term memory storing.

That changes do occur does not mean that they are to do with long term systems
storing as such, they could very well have to do with alterations so that
differing processings can be done better, in other words processing
adaptations.


>And quite a bit of the DNA is "junk" that we and our ancestors right
back to the primordial soup have accumulated from transcription errors,<

What makes you so sure of that?


(I assume various is old stuff that is not used now.
And that various is used in earlier stages.)

>I don't think you could have a cell
that only contained just the DNA sequences it needs.<

Interesting consideration.



>Which opens the possibility that while the cell may not actively use a
particular section, that doesn't necessarily mean it isn't important in finding
the right sections. Perhaps someone who knows more about this could comment.<

I was more thinking there of magic systems resonance(s? Is that the plural?),
but that is not the hardware ...  More like speculating around about hardware
correlated energies, basically.
Also about molecular vibes.

But I am not really much into the verbal there, nor even far in the
speculations.

And I guess that also that was not what you wanted to read about.

;-)

Ci.




More information about the Neur-sci mailing list

Send comments to us at biosci-help [At] net.bio.net