Michael Painter wrote:
>> Newton was a nut also.
> Read the whole article to see what others think about this.
>
Newton isn't even mentioned in the article, but regardless his ideas
might have been "out there" but he had the proof to back them up.
The same cannot be said of *anything* paranormal where there is not the
slightest shred of proof that psychic powers, telepathy or clairvoyancy
exist in any way, shape or form.
