Your exposé has two (at least two) inherent flaws. It has a religiously
comforting undertone, and a religiously comforting overtone!
A less self-deceiving (or less 'escapistic') exposé would stay in the
middle-register where analyses from Brain, Behavioural, and Evolutionary
Science "angels" [of the directional, not of the winged, variety ;-)] makes
increasingly detailed anthropocentric sense of the content of our and
Everything's ultimate mystery - a mystery that is IMO best labelled or
almost concretely conceptualized (in English) by "What Is" or "What Is going
on".
Peter
