"John Schilling" <schillin at spock.usc.edu> wrote in message
news:9bi9g0$am9$1 at spock.usc.edu...
...
> Problem is, the "magnitude" in question is the magnitude of the public
> interest in the development, or of the PR campaign of the developers,
not
> the actual scientific importance. If it doesn't have the right
buzzwords,
> it likely doesn't make the evening news.
Or, alternatively, this is a hoax.