On Sun, 15 Apr 2001 08:34:18 GMT, anxiety man
<saouglubsjb at hotmail.com> wrote:
>Kalman Rubinson wrote:
>>> On Sat, 14 Apr 2001 09:26:12 GMT, anxiety man
>> <saouglubsjb at hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>> >> However, while what you've described probably won't harm you, it is
>> >> not a proven treatment.
>> >Do you have proof that it doesn't work?
>>>> This is a stupid response to that statement. There's no proof that
>> a diet of mashed potatoes and pistachios won't work, either.
>>Are you the stupid police?
>>I think the intention of the statement was clear.
Agreed.
>I could have more properly asked if there was a large body of evidence
>showing it to be largely ineffective.
Certainly. It would mean the same. If the statement is unproven, the
lack of proof against it is irrelevant. It remains unproven.
Kal
