Chazzz <chazz469 at hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:BUuA5.123052$xg1.1088270 at news1.rdc1.sdca.home.com...
> >The harmonic series is very straightforward. I didn't
> >know about the
> >matrices (but they teach those at high school these days
> >too <g>.)
>> It is straightforward, the relationships between the tones are simple
> ratios....
I'm afraid you're losing me. I know about integer frequency ratios and that
an octave is always a factor of two but different tuning systems use
different definitions of other intervals
> 10 cc (628 Hz)
> 4 c (251 Hz)<----- (middle c)
> 2 C (125 Hz)
> 1 CC (62.5 Hz)
but this looks very odd to me.
> So you say..."How is this important?"...
No I don't. I know why it's important (except for that cc) :-)
> >The harmonic series is very straightforward. I didn't know about the
> >matrices (but they teach those at high school these days too <g>.)
>> Ever studied the music of Pierre Boulez? Or the later determinate works
of
> Shoenberg?
No.
> Musical Matrices are very different than the ones that Calculus
> uses.
Then it's not based in mathematics ?
Dave
--
Dave Webber
Author of MOZART the Music Processor for Windows - http://www.mozart.co.uk
Member of the North Cheshire Concert Band http://www.northcheshire.org.uk