>> ok, information that cannot contain a usable message.
>> is there any practical consequence in this science?
>>I used "information" in quotes for a reason. The "quantum information"
>involves in entanglement is not information as the term is normally
>meant (i.e., to transmit a signal).
ok, is there a way of expressing the nature of this entanglement
(not necessary precise) to an amatour in the matters such as myself.
>> If i understood sarfatti right, he was working on some quantum dot
>> chip, that sounds practical.
>>Jack Sarfatti is not where you want to be getting your science news
>from.
ok, point understood, any better sources?
