Patrik Bagge wrote:
> ok, information that cannot contain a usable message.
> is there any practical consequence in this science?
I used "information" in quotes for a reason. The "quantum information"
involves in entanglement is not information as the term is normally
meant (i.e., to transmit a signal).
> If i understood sarfatti right, he was working on some quantum dot
> chip, that sounds practical.
Jack Sarfatti is not where you want to be getting your science news
from.
--
Erik Max Francis | icq 16063900 | whois mf303 | email max at alcyone.com
Alcyone Systems | irc maxxon (efnet) | web http://www.alcyone.com/max/
San Jose, CA | languages en, eo | icbm 37 20 07 N 121 53 38 W
USA | Fri 1999 Oct 22 (41%/950) | &tSftDotIotE
__
/ \ Take a look at your face
\__/ Level 42
