On Mon, 31 May 1999 17:14:04 +0100, "Andrew Fletcher"
<gravitystudy at hotmail.com> wrote:
>Thank you for responding to my post.
Thanks for the immense list of references on the effects of gravity on
our body.
>John and Jean Simkins are respected throughout the World for their work in
>multiple sclerosis. as for peer review, this appears to be a luxury which
>eludes me despite trying to involve many professional people.
>>At the end of the day does it really matter who one is? All than matters is
>what one achieves in this pathetically short existence!
Of course it doesn't matter in the Zen sort of way. But it certainly
matters in scientific study.
>Judge me by what appears on the message board and conclude that there is
>either a mass international conspiracy to promote an unknown nobody's
>theory, or that the people posting might actually be experiencing what they
>post.
Er... Your references just point that gravity has effects on the
physiological state of the human body, which no one doubts. But what
it doesn't show is: any clinical data how sleep position affects
multiple sclerosis.
If there is a reference for any such study, please cite it so I can go
and look at it.
>Take gravity away and there would be no life on Earth. Only Mankind could
>surmise that he is independent of the force of gravity, despite everywhere
>one looks life appears to benefit from its influence. The Atlantic conveyor
>System operates on the same flow and return system!
Look, I'm not disputing that grvaity exists and that it affects living
beings. What I am disputing is whether or not you can claim it affects
us to such a scale. It's like saying "magnetic fields affect much of
life on earth, why aren't humans healed by it?" No logical link.
>Perhaps you would like to explain how the specific gravity of urine drops to
>a zero level when you sleep with your head down and your feet up? Yet the
>opposite is observed when the bed is inclined. How does that fit with your
>text book?
How do you measure the 'specific gravity of urine'?
