IUBio

New Intelligence

Cijadrachon cijadra at zedat.fu-berlin.de
Thu May 27 01:20:46 EST 1999


(Theorizing...)

Roger Steele <rsia1457 at home.com> wrote:

>Will you say more about cancer dangers when tuning for old forms of
>enlightenment?

Forgot if I mentioned it before... :

IMO

In the brain there are energies, also sorts of of bigger fields of
them, and if they get altered, then effects in there can get altered,
up to hardware alterations.

Maybe in the double helix is a data channel and if something is
altered to wrong, stuff changes, and what is "read" from the helix &
produced alteres.

The older the age is the higher the cancer risk might be.

If on common deflective ranges and making a lot of axon activity,
alteration powers of other energies are usually ways weaker then when
transcending and transcended (also by lots of artificial ranges).

So already many of the preforms are dangerous when starting to open up
and vibe with energies that are artificial and bad for the systems.

To shunt to transcending ranges from head to toe and be in links with
many energies is something that here in Berlins with so many T.V. and
handy and other channels is considered a high cancer risk, especially
for older or some very sensitive people.
The way most would not tune systems into a monitor, power pole e-wires
crossing, a running micro wave, a broadcasting tower or other
artificial ranges horrors, it might also wise for some more sensitive
to heed warnings.
For several that already includes being in front of old running
monitors, sleeping next to a load of plugs and cables, being in
artificial light when tired and going down too far in own energies /
axon actions, so that alterations run by artificial vibes can have
more alterating powers, etc.

>determined to acheive enlightenment as Buddha described it...

Of the Buddhas I heard of they did not sound like having tried to
shift to enlightenment energy settings with satellites, T.V. and radio
towers and lots ot other stuff hammering artificial vibes into them.

I am pretty sure they did not try in a city like Berlin for longer.

Imaging your were trying to transcend 
sitting in a building with strucutres ripped out of natural harmonies
over disturbed Earth harmonies, while another watches Rambo and has
electric lights turned on, from the outside techno is beat-changing in
and overpowering the rap and the highway and the horn of an ambulance,
flooding in with the streat lights and the advertising blinking
or something like that.
 
Bit exaggerated, but here is not enough nature to relax into lower
ranges and then steer into more and more transcending ones and share
into Earth harmonies and natural harmonies and galactic and universal
harmonies.

Enlightenment is a bit like a joining with what is.

>and using methods with an ancient source. 
Guess here so much of our old source knowledge was destroyed by
Christians in the times of persecution that here many are not that
picky about the sources and like to learn of many people of many
cultures of many lands of many ages.

>After a relatively short time I did get cancer.
>
>It is cured now...but, what do you think?
>
>						Bob Steele

Do not transcend when your systems warn you about artificial ranges
increasing damages too much.

Do not tune to the very high pitched tones.

When in front of old monitors in(to) ranges of other artificial
devices (including artificial lights)heed your systems warnings about
such.

Several drugs can increase cancer dangers.

Keep your bodies and head sysetms fit.
A healthy body and mind and immune systems 
might protect better than a weak body slouching too much a day in
seats and with too many systems not working as is natural for humas
(many also disturbing natural sleep patterns  or being disturbed in
them or both).
 

Maybe do Tai-Chi.


If the cancer repeats and you have the means, maybe consider to move
to where there are far fewer dangerous artificial ranges.


That was part of what I think,
but as I am not sure if I did not post before, I guess I better keep
it at that.

I am not Dwarf All-Knowing that from here I can perceive your
subatomic structures and your future.

(What I think? I think that I just yawned and should have been
smurfing to bed some hours ago. And other for you irrelevant stuff.
Profane mundane thoughts.
I am LSD-smurf not Buddha-smurf, though I might mention some such
stuff in my teachings as well to some folks.
But more along with other verbal and telepathic random mentionings and
theorizings, like about "seeing", some of Jesus stuff, magic in
general, etc.
I prefer to be a nerd  and so far sense no aspiration in me to work on
me to try to be(come) a Buddha. Given the choice between 
"Your Nerdship" and "Buddha", "Mahatma", "Mahdi", etc. 
as titles for me, I guess the first sounds most enticing to me.
There is something to not having to care much for how to behave, what
to wear, if moths ate holes into it, what your hair looks like, 
if one is being stupid like a retarded orc 
and into enjoying alike manners,  
which impression to leave, and so on,
and there is somethingand to be able if someone sucks to nerd back.

I mean, to yogi-float off the parquet in dignified style at points of
dissent after indicating that I am off for meditating for better being
in the hope to finish my incarnations
or having Buddha - vibe ranges power and inside being a Buddha is sure
impressive enough, but maybe often I prefer B&B stylish 
that sucks, heh-heh,  over most intellectually more straining
activities.
I am not sure you are asking the right person here.) 

Basically just watch what your systems are telling you.
If into enlightenment you should know your own akasha systems anyway,
whatever over there you folks term that.
Guess you could start with learning more about perceiving your
internal sytems so you get better when they do not like something that
you do  and learn better when it is important to heed that.

...Another yawn.... I should flap into my coffin before I get turned
into ashes by the sun.



More information about the Neur-sci mailing list

Send comments to us at biosci-help [At] net.bio.net