IUBio

Comparing animal's and human brians

F. Frank LeFever flefever at ix.netcom.com
Mon May 24 20:33:02 EST 1999


Ivan, your English is clearly better than my Russian, but you seem to
be missing something...

Frank


In <3771E137.DDE209DC at phys.chem.msu.ru> TIY at phys.chem.msu.ru (Ivan
Torshin) writes: 
>
>F. Frank LeFever wrote:
>> 
>> In <7i42bi$sij$1 at news5.svr.pol.co.uk> "Simon Marsh"
>> <simonmarsh at tardis99.freeserve.co.uk> writes:
>> >
>> >As humans only use 1/100 of 1 percent (.0001) of out potential
brain
>> >capacity how does this compare to other animals?
>> >
>> >
>
>It is about those humans who are almost like animals, due to
>their unconfounded egoes and their dirty characteristics, known
>from The Books.
>
>> >
>> >If the animal in question refrains from making ridiculous
assertions
>> as if they were fact, or at least shows some understanding that the
>> assertion needs to be qualified (e.g. "I've heard it said that...")
>> then the animal compares very favorably.
>> 
>> F. LeFever
>
>whoever refrains from unnecessary assertions, especially ridiculous...
>Answer is already given, for an animal in English is mostly referred
to 
>as "it", not "who" !
>
>That "animal" is human's predecessor.
>
>ivan.
>---




More information about the Neur-sci mailing list

Send comments to us at biosci-help [At] net.bio.net