Ivan, your English is clearly better than my Russian, but you seem to
be missing something...
Frank
In <3771E137.DDE209DC at phys.chem.msu.ru> TIY at phys.chem.msu.ru (Ivan
Torshin) writes:
>>F. Frank LeFever wrote:
>>>> In <7i42bi$sij$1 at news5.svr.pol.co.uk> "Simon Marsh"
>> <simonmarsh at tardis99.freeserve.co.uk> writes:
>> >
>> >As humans only use 1/100 of 1 percent (.0001) of out potential
brain
>> >capacity how does this compare to other animals?
>> >
>> >
>>It is about those humans who are almost like animals, due to
>their unconfounded egoes and their dirty characteristics, known
>from The Books.
>>> >
>> >If the animal in question refrains from making ridiculous
assertions
>> as if they were fact, or at least shows some understanding that the
>> assertion needs to be qualified (e.g. "I've heard it said that...")
>> then the animal compares very favorably.
>>>> F. LeFever
>>whoever refrains from unnecessary assertions, especially ridiculous...
>Answer is already given, for an animal in English is mostly referred
to
>as "it", not "who" !
>>That "animal" is human's predecessor.
>>ivan.
>---