F. Frank LeFever wrote:
>> In <7i42bi$sij$1 at news5.svr.pol.co.uk> "Simon Marsh"
> <simonmarsh at tardis99.freeserve.co.uk> writes:
> >
> >As humans only use 1/100 of 1 percent (.0001) of out potential brain
> >capacity how does this compare to other animals?
> >
> >
It is about those humans who are almost like animals, due to
their unconfounded egoes and their dirty characteristics, known
from The Books.
> >
> >If the animal in question refrains from making ridiculous assertions
> as if they were fact, or at least shows some understanding that the
> assertion needs to be qualified (e.g. "I've heard it said that...")
> then the animal compares very favorably.
>> F. LeFever
whoever refrains from unnecessary assertions, especially ridiculous...
Answer is already given, for an animal in English is mostly referred to
as "it", not "who" !
That "animal" is human's predecessor.
ivan.
---